Gravesham Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandGravesend

Official UK PPONPMLY-3374-CWYX

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months3+50% vs prior 12 months (2)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Contracts ending ≤18 months11 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.1mnet · on 2 of 2 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

45 Construction work2 procedures · 40%

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 5 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(5 notices)
    5 of 5 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted40%(2 notices)
    2 of 5 notices are Limited / restricted (40%).
  • Direct award20%(1 notice)
    1 of 5 notices is Direct award (20%).
  • Open20%(1 notice)
    1 of 5 notices is Open (20%).
  • Route not published20%(1 notice)
    1 of 5 notices is Route not published (20%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 5 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 5 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Verde Landscapes Ltd240%2212 Nov 2025
Prosperon Networks Ltd120%11—
Zurich Municipalframework/DPS on 1120%01—
PiLON Ltd120%01—

5 awarded procedures across 4 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.1mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 2 of 2 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
St Andrew's Gardens Phase IIVerde Landscapes Ltd12 Nov 20251.3 yrs£1,000,000
≈ £750k/yr
ITSM platformProsperon Networks Ltd—3 yrs£57,500 †
≈ £19k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

2 of 4 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
St Andrew's Gardens Phase IIVerde Landscapes Ltd31 Mar 2027£1,200,000

Recent procedures

Latest 7 of 7 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
ITSM platformAwarded / complete20 Apr 2026—
St Andrew's Gardens Phase IIAwarded / complete30 Mar 2026—
St Andrew's Gardens Phase IIAwarded / complete14 Nov 2025—
St Andrew's Gardens Phase IILandscaping workOpen3 Oct 2025£1,000,000
St Andrew's relandscaping Phase IILandscaping workPlanning2 Sept 2025£800,000
Aids and Adaptation & Associated Works for Gravesham Borough Councilcentral purchasing bodyRepair and maintenance servicesAwarded / complete5 Jan 2024—
Further Competition under Insurance Placement DPS 978 for Gravesham Borough Council and their appointed Insurance Broker - AonDPS6 lotsFinancial and insurance servicesAwarded / complete6 Jul 2022—

Search all 7 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 2 of 4 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.