Inverclyde Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

ONS register: Local-authority-districtLocal authorityScotlandGreenockCentral purchasing body on 9 of 19 notices

Official UK PPONPLMW-7749-VHNR

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months11+38% vs prior 12 months (8)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot37.7% single-bid · 13 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 13 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share14%of 36 awarded procedures · 52 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

36 awarded tenders, 52 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months209 within 6 months · 10 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£6.0mnet · on 16 of 16 published values · top 5 = 67%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 19 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(19 notices)
    19 of 19 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open68%(13 notices)
    13 of 19 notices are Open (68%).
  • Route not published16%(3 notices)
    3 of 19 notices are Route not published (16%).
  • Limited / restricted11%(2 notices)
    2 of 19 notices are Limited / restricted (11%).
  • Selective5%(1 notice)
    1 of 19 notices is Selective (5%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 13 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=137.7% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 19 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

110 of 19 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Inverclyde Community Development Trust38.3%14—
Stepwell Consultancy Ltd.38.3%13—
Business Development Advisers Ltd25.6%13—
Financial Fitness25.6%12—
Critiqom Ltd25.6%12—
Centregreat Ltd25.6%12—
Scotia Homecare Solutions Limitedframework/DPS on 225.6%03—
Care1 Professional Services LTDframework/DPS on 225.6%03—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 14% of 36 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 52 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£6.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 16 of 16 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 67%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£220k middle valuerobust · n=16Middle half £136k–£469k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of an Intensive Fammily Support ServiceAberlour Child Care Trust——£1,440,000 †
Provision of Road Lighting and Traffic Sign LightingCentregreat Ltd——£762,000 †
PPM of Gas Fired Boilers and Associated Plant, Including Provision of Call Out and Reactive RepairsValley Group Limited——£734,712 †
Replacement Financial Management System, Software as a Service (SaaS).Technology One UK Limited——£710,041 †
Environmental Employment ProgrammeInverclyde Community Development Trust——£388,015 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

53 of 56 contracts carry an end date, 24 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 20 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 48 of 48 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Provision of a Mental Health Recovery ServiceCommunity health servicesOpen21 Sept 2026—
Provision of a Recovery Service (Alcohol and Drugs)central purchasing body2 lotsMiscellaneous health servicesOpen11 Sept 2026£1,200,000
Provision of Road Lighting and Traffic Sign LightingElectrical installation workAwarded / complete7 Sept 2026£1,220,000
Utilities Spend Recovery ReviewAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
Pathways to Employment and In-Work SupportCareer guidance servicesAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026—
Provision of Annual Support & Maintenance for SWIFT and SAP Business Objects Licencescentral purchasing bodyMaintenance of information technology softwareAwarded / complete8 Jun 2026—
Delivery Partner for Nature Restoration Fund & Related Grounds ProjectsNature reserve servicesAwarded / complete29 May 2026£300,000
PPM of Gas Fired Boilers and Associated Plant, Including Provision of Call Out and Reactive RepairsRepair and maintenance services of boilersAwarded / complete24 Apr 2026£810,000
Provision of Employability Services in Inverclydecentral purchasing body7 lotsAdult and other education servicesAwarded / complete15 Apr 2026—
Gateway Recovery Servicescentral purchasing bodyOther communityPlanned19 Mar 2026£240,000
Replacement Financial Management System, Software as a Service (SaaS).central purchasing bodyIT services: consultingAwarded / complete3 Mar 2026—
Provision of an Intensive Fammily Support Servicecentral purchasing bodyHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete4 Nov 2025£1,444,000
Provision of a Property Valuation ServiceProperty management services of real estate on a fee or contract basisOpen1 Oct 2025—
Business Gateway Services in InverclydeBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2025—
Appointment of RSL or Development Partner for Development of Clune Park Site in Port Glasgowcentral purchasing bodyArchitecturalPlanned10 Jul 2025—
Provision of a Printing, Binding, Enveloping, Mailing & e-Billing ServiceMailing servicesAwarded / complete16 Jun 2025—
Tree Cutting and Removalcentral purchasing bodyTree-cutting servicesCancelled5 Jun 2025—
Independent Advocacy Service for Adultscentral purchasing bodyHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete5 Mar 2025—
Market Research - Provision of Printing, Binding, Enveloping, Mailing & e-billing ServicesPostal servicesPlanned17 Feb 2025—
Decriminalised Parking Enforcement Back Office Supportcentral purchasing bodyBusiness transaction and personal business software packageAwarded / complete27 Jan 2025—

Search all 48 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 53 of 56 published contracts have an end date; 24 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.