Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentNorth West EnglandTrafford

Official UK PPONPXQG-2592-VYYYWebsitemft.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months40-26% vs prior 12 months (54)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot160% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share22%of 73 awarded procedures · 47 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

73 awarded tenders, 47 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months115 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£65mnet · on 39 of 39 published values · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 94 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract95%(89 notices)
    89 of 94 notices are Contract (95%).
  • Framework5%(5 notices)
    5 of 94 notices are Framework (5%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted41%(39 notices)
    39 of 94 notices are Limited / restricted (41%).
  • Direct award24%(23 notices)
    23 of 94 notices are Direct award (24%).
  • Route not published21%(20 notices)
    20 of 94 notices are Route not published (21%).
  • Selective9%(8 notices)
    8 of 94 notices are Selective (9%).
  • Open4%(4 notices)
    4 of 94 notices are Open (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1robust · n=560% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 94 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 94 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Healthcare Business Solutions UK Ltd79.6%77—
Fortify Clinic Limited68.2%66—
Circle Health Group Limited34.1%33—
RADIOLOGY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED34.1%33—
Pioneer Healthcare Limited34.1%33—
MC Diagnostics Ltd22.7%2413 May 2026
Eurobio Scientific UK Limited22.7%2312 May 2026
BELMONT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD22.7%23—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 22% of 73 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 47 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£65mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 39 of 39 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£264k middle valuerobust · n=39Middle half £63k–£483k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Security Services (Trust-wide)Guarding Solutions and Training Services Ltd31 Jul 20262.9 yrs · up to 5 yrs£45,000,000
≈ £15m/yr
Insourcing for Elective Care - Lot 1 VariousOUTPATIENT NETWORK LIMITED——£5,200,000 †
Employability Service - Work Well and an Economic Inactivity TrailblazerThe Growth Company Limited—3 yrs · up to 6 yrs£2,383,505 †
≈ £795k/yr
LABScreen Testing Kits, LINKSEQ Testing Kits and LABType Typing KitsVH Bio Ltd——£2,218,515 †
Alloseq Tx17 NGS HLA Typing Solutions KitsMC Diagnostics Ltd—8 mo · up to 1.7 yrs£975,532 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

16 of 69 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 11 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 107 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
MRI - PET Scanner Chiller ReplacementConstruction workCancelled14 Oct 2026£20,000
NCF-2627- CTDNA Oxford NanographAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
Insourcing Arrangement for Elective Care - Lot 3Health servicesAwarded / complete28 Sept 2026—
Provision of Decontamination Services Department - Traceability SystemAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
GP Insourcing at UTC A&E Minors WythenshaweHealth servicesAwarded / complete22 Sept 2026—
Provision of Rubidium 82 GeneratorAwarded / complete22 Sept 2026—
Cytology CouriersAwarded / complete3 Sept 2026—
Alloseq Tx17 NGS HLA Typing Solutions KitsAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026—
Security Services (Trust-wide)Security servicesAwarded / complete31 Jul 2026£45,000,000
MFT-MT-0388 1x Neuromate RobotAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
MFT-MT-0413 XEVO TQ-XS, UPLC I BIN SOL MGR, UPLC I SMP MGR-FL , S/W Benefits MLYAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
MFT-MT-0683 "2x 3500xL Genetic Analyzer 1x DNA Analyzer ABI PrAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
MFT-MT-0911 AMARIS MODEL 750S EXCIMER LASERAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
MFT-MT-0820-L Power Tools + DrillsAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
MFT-MT-1006 14x Belmont Rapid Infuser R12 / 1x BELMONT RAPID INFUSER OBMAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
BOSTON - ICEFX CRYOBLATION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT AND CONSUMABLE AGREEMENTMedical equipmentsAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Cytology Couriers ServicesAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
Teleradiology Lung Cancer Screening Remote ReportingHealth servicesAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
NGS Turbo Testing KitsAwarded / complete5 Jun 2026—
Provision of Healthcare Non-Infectious Waste CollectionsNon-hazardous refuse and waste treatment and disposal servicesOpen2 Jun 2026£2,800,000

Search all 107 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 16 of 69 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.