National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyNHS ODS: OTHER STATUTORY AUTHORITY (OSA)Central governmentNorth West EnglandManchester

Official UK PPONPHZT-4273-LJQDWebsitenice.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months25+178% vs prior 12 months (9)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot60% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share16%of 43 awarded procedures · 56 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

43 awarded tenders, 56 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months595 within 6 months · 52 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£2.4mnet · on 27 of 27 published values · top 5 = 55%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 34 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract94%(32 notices)
    32 of 34 notices are Contract (94%).
  • Framework6%(2 notices)
    2 of 34 notices are Framework (6%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award50%(17 notices)
    17 of 34 notices are Direct award (50%).
  • Open29%(10 notices)
    10 of 34 notices are Open (29%).
  • Limited / restricted15%(5 notices)
    5 of 34 notices are Limited / restricted (15%).
  • Selective3%(1 notice)
    1 of 34 notices is Selective (3%).
  • Route not published3%(1 notice)
    1 of 34 notices is Route not published (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6moderate · n=30% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

35 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 34 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

07 of 34 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
John Wiley & Sons Limited37%2312 May 2025
Coreva Scientific24.7%22—
Dynata LLC24.7%2213 May 2026
Institute for Healthcare Improvement12.3%1216 Jun 2025
CANVS LTD12.3%1214 Jul 2026
Political Engagement Limited12.3%1210 Aug 2026
Charlesbye Limited12.3%125 Jun 2025
Precise Media Monitoring Ltd12.3%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 16% of 43 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 56 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£2.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 27 of 27 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 55%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£51k middle valuerobust · n=27Middle half £36k–£81k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Cochrane Library Content (Wiley Online Library use)John Wiley & Sons Limited—2 yrs£520,000
≈ £260k/yr
NICE Conference 2027-29Political Engagement Limited—3.3 yrs · up to 5.3 yrs£300,000 †
≈ £92k/yr
CQI 2025-27Institute for Healthcare Improvement—1.7 yrs£249,447 †
≈ £150k/yr
Crucial conversations for mastering dialoguePersonal Strengths Publishing Ltd—9 mo£124,800
SPS Medicines Horizon Scanning ServiceLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (LUHFT)—5 mo£120,000

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

73 of 82 contracts carry an end date, 57 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 59 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 55 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
NICE Comms Review AuditMarket research servicesAwarded / complete4 Feb 2026£120,000
Ethical and Effective Adoption and Governance of AI Use at NICEAwarded / complete29 Jan 2026—
Crucial conversations for mastering dialogueAwarded / complete27 Jan 2026—
Carver Coaching Master Service AgreementAwarded / complete20 Jan 2026—
EAG mini RUAAwarded / complete20 Jan 2026—
EAG mini EUAAwarded / complete20 Jan 2026—
Active Bystander Training ServicesAwarded / complete18 Dec 2025—
Orgnisational Management Training ProgrammeAwarded / complete15 Dec 2025—
Cyber Security ServicesFrameworkInformation technology servicesAwarded / complete9 Oct 2025—
NICE Knowledge Resources FrameworkFramework8 lotsLibrary servicesAwarded / complete13 Jun 2025£40,000,000
Cochrane Library Content (Wiley Online Library use)Awarded / complete12 May 2025—
Cochrane Library Content (Wiley Online Library use)Awarded / complete12 May 2025—
NICE contract for proactive messaging campaign and review and strengthening of communications approachMarket research servicesOpen11 Mar 2025£120,000
NICE contract for proactive messaging campaign and review and strengthening of communications approachMarket research servicesOpen11 Mar 2025£120,000
NICE contract for proactive messaging campaign and review and strengthening of communications approachMarket research servicesOpen11 Mar 2025£120,000
NICE External Assessment Groups FrameworkFramework4 lotsResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesOpen22 Nov 2024£3,345,000
Amazon Web Services3 lotsComputer network servicesAwarded / complete13 Sept 2024—
Microsoft Products ResellerComputer-related servicesAwarded / complete5 Sept 2024—
NICE Framework for Healthcare Knowledge ResourcesFramework5 lotsLibrary and archive servicesPlanned19 Apr 2024£40,000,000
Laptop build and supplyFrameworkHardwareAwarded / complete1 Mar 2024—

Search all 55 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 73 of 82 published contracts have an end date; 57 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.