Care City Innovation C.I.C: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Companies House: Community Interest Company·Barking, Essex·Greater London·Main market: Social work services
Official UK PPONPCCY-9241-MYHV
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
10 awards (10 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 10 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
8531 Social work services3 awards · 30% · awards naming a lot7133 Miscellaneous engineering services1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot8530 Social work and related services1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot8532 Social services1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot9251 Library and archive services1 award · 10% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 1 wins across all categories. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Health Evidence & Library Services | Suffolk County Council | — | 2 yrs · up to 4 yrs | £90,000 † ≈ £45k/yr |
| TECa Diagnostic Review | London Borough of Lewisham | — | 4 mo | £69,180 † |
| ESF DCT consensus support | National Institute for Health and Care Excellence | — | 6 mo | £37,350 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 8 of 8 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Central government50%(5 awards)
5 of 10 awards are Central government (50%).Local authority40%(4 awards)
4 of 10 awards are Local authority (40%).Other public body10%(1 award)
1 of 10 awards is Other public body (10%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| London Borough of Barking and Dagenham | 2 | 25% | 2 | 27 Jul 2026 |
| East Of England NHS Collaborative Hub c/o West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust | 1 | 12.5% | 3 | 14 Nov 2025 |
| Suffolk County Council | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 5 Feb 2026 |
| London Borough of Lewisham | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 31 Oct 2025 |
| National Institute for Health and Care Excellence | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| Government Commercial Agency | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 19 Jan 2026 |
| United Utilities Water Limited | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 27 Feb 2026 |
Share = of the 8 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
9 of 10 awards carry an end date · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Voice, Influence and Representation Services | 7 Dec 2026 | £600,000 |
| Social and Community Cohesion Services | 7 Dec 2026 | £700,000 |
| VCSE System Leadership & Infrastructure Representation | 7 Dec 2026 | £400,000 |
| ESF DCT consensus support | 26 Mar 2027 | £37,350 |
| Digital Outcomes and Specialists 7 | 29 Jul 2027 | £3,240,000,000 |
| Public Health Evidence & Library Services | 31 Mar 2028 | £90,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 10 of 10 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 9 of 10 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.