National Wealth Fund Limited: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyOther public bodyYorkshire and the HumberLeeds

Official UK PPONPZLH-3537-RPCPWebsiteatamis-3929.my.site.com ↗

Open now1next deadline 12 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months23+92% vs prior 12 months (12)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot7.50% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share19%of 27 awarded procedures · 30 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

27 awarded tenders, 30 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months32 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£17mnet · on 17 of 20 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 92%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Insurance Brokerage Services12 Nov 202614d£300,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 35 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(34 notices)
    34 of 35 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system3%(1 notice)
    1 of 35 notices is Dynamic purchasing system (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted34%(12 notices)
    12 of 35 notices are Limited / restricted (34%).
  • Direct award23%(8 notices)
    8 of 35 notices are Direct award (23%).
  • Open23%(8 notices)
    8 of 35 notices are Open (23%).
  • Route not published14%(5 notices)
    5 of 35 notices are Route not published (14%).
  • Selective6%(2 notices)
    2 of 35 notices are Selective (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

7.5moderate · n=40% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

86 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 35 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

07 of 35 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Verdigris Strategic Ltd27.4%22—
Plane Perspective Limited27.4%22—
Topikimoro Ltd trading as Firefly Partners13.7%129 Sept 2026
New Link Consulting LLP13.7%12—
PortF.io13.7%127 Aug 2026
SATIGO Ltd13.7%1210 Dec 2025
Pearse Partners Ltd13.7%1210 Dec 2025
Kroll Associates U.K. Limited13.7%129 Sept 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 19% of 27 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 30 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£17mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 17 of 20 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 92%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£173k middle valuerobust · n=17Middle half £38k–£300k; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Investment Management Solution & related professional services for the National Wealth Fund LimitedPortF.io—5.8 yrs · up to 10.8 yrs£13,000,000 †
≈ £2.3m/yr
Long Term Management Due Diligence - Primary ContractKroll Associates U.K. Limited4 Sept 20264 yrs£950,000
≈ £238k/yr
Long Term Management Due Diligence - Secondary ContractTopikimoro Ltd trading as Firefly Partners4 Sept 20264 yrs£550,000
≈ £138k/yr
Group Income Protection PolicyCanada Life Limited——£520,931 †
Expert Networks Long Term Provision - Primary ContractGuidepoint Global, LLC10 Sept 20264 yrs£300,000
≈ £75k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

18 of 31 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 36 of 36 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Upcoming Request for Information (RFI): Supplier & Customer Due Diligence & Know Your Customer ServicesResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesPlanning1 Apr 2026£990,000
C1287 Data City Real Time Data PlatformAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
C1281 Mergermarket Ltd Infralogic SubscriptionAwarded / complete30 Mar 2026—
Permanent Recruitment Services for Investment Banking rolesRecruitment servicesAwarded / complete12 Jan 2026£2,100,000
C1103 - Strategic AdvisoryAwarded / complete18 Sept 2025—
C1103 - Strategic Advisory - Project EnvisageAwarded / complete18 Sept 2025—
Retained Advisory Support in relation to Financial Crime RiskBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete10 Jul 2025£50,000
Project Bonomi - NWF Leeds and London Office enhancementsOther building completion workPlanning12 Jun 2025—
Project Bonomi - NWF Leeds and London Office enhancementsOther building completion workPlanning12 Jun 2025—
Retained Advisory Support in relation to Financial Crime RiskBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesOpen27 Mar 2025£50,000
UKIB DPS for Expert Advice Services v.2DPSAdvisory and consultative engineering servicesOpen20 Feb 2025£4,500,000
Investment Management Solution (s)IT services: consultingPlanned20 Feb 2025—
Market Data Services Dynamic Purchasing SystemDPSBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesOpen5 Feb 2025£19,000,000
Group Income Protection PolicyInsurance servicesAwarded / complete19 Dec 2024—
Expert Network ServicesBusiness services: lawPlanned19 Nov 2024£300,000

Search all 36 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 18 of 31 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.