NHS England: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public body·NHS ODS: OTHER STATUTORY AUTHORITY (OSA)·Central government·Greater London·London·Ran 1 procurement for other authorities
Official UK PPONPDPT-3135-BWWYWebsiteengland.nhs.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 157 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
1,693 awarded tenders, 1,711 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
11 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strengthening Cultural Capability and Trauma Informed Care in Women’s Health | 30 Oct 2026 | 2d | £175,000 |
| NHS National Framework for Lenvatinib | 30 Oct 2026 | 2d | £35,833,000 |
| Quality Assurance & Improvement of Structured Learning Placement (SLP) Modules | 3 Nov 2026 | 6d | £98,000 |
| Independent eval. of the NHS solar and battery storage scheme 25/26 | 6 Nov 2026 | 9d | £95,000 |
| Maintenance of the National Competency Framework for Data Professionals | 6 Nov 2026 | 9d | £80,000 |
| National Competency Framework for Data: Adoption, Impact & Evidence Review | 6 Nov 2026 | 9d | £95,000 |
| Tech support for the dev. of the PCF requirements of the NHS Supplier Roadmap | 9 Nov 2026 | 12d | £96,000 |
| NHS Graduate Management Training Scheme (GMTS) Virtual Assessment Centre (VAC) Service - NHSE | 10 Nov 2026 | 13d | £534,780 |
| Targeted Prostate Cancer Screening Programme – PSA Laboratory Processing Service | 10 Nov 2026 | 13d | £238,608 |
| Tech support for the dev. of the PCF requirements of the NHS Supplier Roadmap | 11 Nov 2026 | 14d | £96,000 |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
85 Health and social work services354 procedures · 23% · 3 open80 Education and training services171 procedures · 11% · 3 open33 Medical equipments, pharmaceuticals95 procedures · 6% · 1 open72 IT services: consulting, software, internet74 procedures · 5%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting47 procedures · 3% · 3 open48 Software package and information systems35 procedures · 2%75 Administration, defence and social security11 procedures · 1%73 Research and development services10 procedures · 1%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 1,556 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract94%(1,456 notices)
1,456 of 1,556 notices are Contract (94%).Framework6%(99 notices)
99 of 1,556 notices are Framework (6%).Dynamic purchasing system0%(1 notice)
1 of 1,556 notices is Dynamic purchasing system (0%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Direct award52%(810 notices)
810 of 1,556 notices are Direct award (52%).Open17%(269 notices)
269 of 1,556 notices are Open (17%).Route not published15%(231 notices)
231 of 1,556 notices are Route not published (15%).Limited / restricted14%(221 notices)
221 of 1,556 notices are Limited / restricted (14%).Selective2%(25 notices)
25 of 1,556 notices are Selective (2%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 157 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 68 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 1,556 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 18 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teva UK Ltd | 43 | 2.5% | 16 | 80 | 27 Aug 2026 |
| ACCORD-UK LTD | 42 | 2.5% | 17 | 78 | 27 Aug 2026 |
| Zentiva Pharma UK Ltd | 39 | 2.3% | 15 | 63 | 27 Aug 2026 |
| Thornton and Ross Ltd | 39 | 2.3% | 15 | 63 | 27 Aug 2026 |
| Pfizer Ltd | 36 | 2.1% | 14 | 67 | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Mylan | 33 | 1.9% | 13 | 48 | 27 Aug 2026 |
| Sandoz | 32 | 1.9% | 9 | 58 | 27 Aug 2026 |
| Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd | 28 | 1.7% | 12 | 45 | 27 Aug 2026 |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 3% of 1,693 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 1,711 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET-CT Services | Alliance Medical Ltd | — | 1.3 yrs | £886,054,050 † ≈ £665m/yr |
| Specialised Commissioning Acute Services- Midlands | University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust | — | — | £853,213,637 † |
| Specialised Commissioning Acute Services- London | Barts Health NHS Trust | — | — | £838,945,907 † |
| Specialised Commissioning Retained Mental Health, Learning Disability and Autism Services (MHLDA)- Midlands | Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust | — | — | £805,815,255 † |
| Specialised Commissioning Acute Contract- North East & Yorkshire | LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST | — | — | £773,574,759 † |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
3,863 of 5,025 contracts carry an end date, 571 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
Soonest 10 of 830 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 2,306 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 3,863 of 5,025 published contracts have an end date; 571 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.