North Star Housing Group Limited: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Registered SocietySocial housing register: Registered societyNorth East EnglandStockton-on-Tees

Official UK PPONPTGM-5183-NXYN

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months6+50% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot40% single-bid · 9 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share23%of 13 awarded procedures · 19 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

13 awarded tenders, 19 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£1.3mnet · on 5 of 5 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 10 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(10 notices)
    10 of 10 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open70%(7 notices)
    7 of 10 notices are Open (70%).
  • Route not published20%(2 notices)
    2 of 10 notices are Route not published (20%).
  • Limited / restricted10%(1 notice)
    1 of 10 notices is Limited / restricted (10%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=90% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 6 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

69 daysrobust · n=6
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 10 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

16 of 10 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Marsh Ltd17.7%1425 Jun 2026
Zenith Mechanical Services Ltd17.7%1228 May 2026
HOUSING INSIGHT LTD17.7%1116 May 2025
MMC FACILITY MANAGMENT LIMITED17.7%115 Feb 2026
J.W. GARNHAM & SON LTD17.7%118 Jun 2026
ANS Group Limited17.7%1122 Sept 2025
Advisory insurance brokers17.7%1125 Jun 2026
J W Garnham17.7%118 Jun 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 23% of 13 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 19 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 5 of 5 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 3 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£25k middle valuerobust · n=5Middle half £21k–£30k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Insurance and related services for Property, legal liability and other general (non-life) insurable risks, as required by North Star Housing Group LimitedMarsh Ltd25 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£1,200,000
≈ £400k/yr
Insurance and related services associated with Cyber Risk for North Star Housing Group LimitedMarsh Ltd25 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£30,000
≈ £10k/yr
Insurance and related services associated with Directors' and Officers' Liability for North Star Housing Group LimitedMarsh Ltd25 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£25,000
≈ £8k/yr
Insurance and related services associated with Engineering Inspections for North Star Housing Group LimitedMarsh Ltd25 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£21,000
≈ £7k/yr
Insurance and related services associated with Terrorism and/or Political Violence (Non Pool-Re) for North Star Housing Group LimitedAdvisory insurance brokers25 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£20,000
≈ £7k/yr

Recent procedures

Latest 20 of 20 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Servicing and Repair of Commercial Gas Heating EquipmentGas appliance maintenance servicesAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026£700,000
External Works 2026FencesAwarded / complete15 Jul 2026£2,708,333
Provision of Insurance and related Services to North Star Housing Group Limited6 lotsContractor's all-risk insurance servicesAwarded / complete4 Jul 2026£2,096,000
Digital Payment ServicesBusiness transaction and personal business software packageAwarded / complete4 Jun 2026£280,000
Finance SystemSoftware package and information systemsPlanning8 Apr 2026—
Electrical Testing (EICR and Remedials) ServiceElectrical servicesAwarded / complete5 Feb 2026£400,000
Insurance and related services for Property, legal liability and other general (non-life) insurable risks, as required by North Star Housing Group LimitedInsurance servicesPlanning28 Oct 2025£2,150,000
ICT Managed ServiceComputer platformsAwarded / complete2 Oct 2025£1,800,000
Lift Management ServiceLift-maintenance servicesOpen29 Aug 2025£40,000
Software Application TenderAwarded / complete5 Jun 2025—
Housing Management SystemSoftware implementation servicesAwarded / complete4 Apr 2023£100,000
Access Control and Warden CallAccess control systemOpen13 Sept 2022£250,000
External WorksRestructuring workAwarded / complete25 Jul 2022£2,700,000
Responsive Repairs and Void MaintenanceRepair and maintenance servicesAwarded / complete15 Jun 2022£19,000,000
Catering Services - Aspen Gardens BistroCanteen and catering servicesAwarded / complete29 Mar 2022£1,667,000
Legal ServicesFrameworkcentral purchasing bodyLegal servicesAwarded / complete20 Dec 2021£2,400,000
Responsive MaintenanceRepair and maintenance servicesPlanned25 Oct 2021£7,000,000
Housing Management Systemcentral purchasing bodySoftware package and information systemsPlanned6 Oct 2021—
External Windows and DoorsInstallation of doors and windowsAwarded / complete23 Aug 2021£1,050,000
Tanfield Road Development ProjectSite-development workAwarded / complete22 Jul 2021£1,800,000

Search all 20 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 13 of 13 published contracts have an end date; 10 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.