ORDNANCE SURVEY LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: Private Limited Company·GOV.UK register: Public corporation·Other public body·South East England·Southampton
Companies House09121572 ↗Websiteos.co.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
80 awarded tenders, 71 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
48 Software package and information systems17 procedures · 20%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet13 procedures · 15%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting10 procedures · 12%38 Laboratory, optical and precision5 procedures · 6%34 Transport equipment and products4 procedures · 5%71 Architectural, construction, engineering4 procedures · 5%30 Office and computing machinery2 procedures · 2%35 Security, fire-fighting, police2 procedures · 2%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 86 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract88%(76 notices)
76 of 86 notices are Contract (88%).Framework12%(10 notices)
10 of 86 notices are Framework (12%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Direct award30%(26 notices)
26 of 86 notices are Direct award (30%).Limited / restricted23%(20 notices)
20 of 86 notices are Limited / restricted (23%).Route not published20%(17 notices)
17 of 86 notices are Route not published (20%).Open14%(12 notices)
12 of 86 notices are Open (14%).Selective13%(11 notices)
11 of 86 notices are Selective (13%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 11 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 86 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 8 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIC Technologies Ltd | 4 | 5% | 3 | 4 | 13 Aug 2026 |
| Landmark Information Group Ltd | 4 | 5% | 2 | 4 | 28 Sept 2026 |
| IRG Advisors LLP trading as Odgers Berndtson | 3 | 3.8% | 3 | 3 | — |
| Altavia UK | 2 | 2.5% | 2 | 2 | 13 May 2026 |
| HOOTSUITE INC | 2 | 2.5% | 2 | 2 | — |
| Renovo Employment Group Ltd. | 2 | 2.5% | 2 | 2 | — |
| Anything Is Possible Media Limited | 2 | 2.5% | 1 | 2 | 21 Jul 2025 |
| Kantar UK Limited | 2 | 2.5% | 1 | 2 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 80 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 71 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract for the provision of IT Service and Software Development Provider for the Development and Support of the OS Maps Product | Spyrosoft Limited | 24 Apr 2026 | 3 yrs · up to 7 yrs | £55,000,000 ≈ £18m/yr |
| National Underground Asset Register (NUAR) Data Transformation and Ingestion Service | 1Spatial Group Ltd | 17 Nov 2025 | 2.3 yrs · up to 5.3 yrs | £5,000,000 ≈ £2.1m/yr |
| Warehousing, Logistics and Fulfilment Services | Michael Davies & Associates Limited | — | — | £4,400,000 † |
| Data Improvement - Total Revision (TR) Prestige Sites | IIC Technologies Ltd | 13 Aug 2026 | 3.9 yrs | £1,900,000 ≈ £485k/yr |
| Business to Business (B2B) and Business to Government (B2G) Marketing Agency Services | Proctor and Stevenson Limited | 17 Jul 2026 | 3 yrs · up to 5 yrs | £1,500,000 ≈ £500k/yr |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
57 of 63 contracts carry an end date, 10 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board Evaluation | Independent Audit | 15 Nov 2026 | £58,800 |
| SLT Connect Leadership Development | The Performants Group Limited (Trading as T-minus) | 30 Nov 2026 | £34,125 |
| Frontify Licences | Frontify AG | 16 Dec 2026 | €26,572 |
| Provision of a Collaborative Interface Design Tool | Figma Inc | 16 Jan 2027 | US$61,056 |
| Imagery First PoC (Proof of Concept) | IIC Technologies Ltd | 31 Jan 2027 | £60,000 |
| Web Application Firewall | CDW Limited | 26 Feb 2027 | £78,731 |
| User Experience and User Insight Platform | UserTesting Technologies Limited | 8 Mar 2027 estimated | £299,214 |
| B2B Marketing Attribution Model | StrategiQ Marketing Ltd | 31 Mar 2027 | £67,620 |
| Cleaning Services for Geovation | Intelligent Workplace Solutions Ltd | 31 Mar 2027 | £47,854 |
| Teleordering | MVB Books UK Ltd (manual) | 1 Apr 2027 | £89,834 |
Soonest 10 of 34 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 145 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 57 of 63 published contracts have an end date; 10 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.