The Christie NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentNorth West EnglandManchester

Official UK PPONPTTQ-9511-YPYHWebsitechristie.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months102+168% vs prior 12 months (38)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share22%of 147 awarded procedures · 94 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

147 awarded tenders, 94 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months5516 within 6 months · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£28mnet · on 139 of 139 published values · top 5 = 83%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 140 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(140 notices)
    140 of 140 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award58%(81 notices)
    81 of 140 notices are Direct award (58%).
  • Limited / restricted37%(52 notices)
    52 of 140 notices are Limited / restricted (37%).
  • Route not published3%(4 notices)
    4 of 140 notices are Route not published (3%).
  • Open1%(2 notices)
    2 of 140 notices are Open (1%).
  • Selective1%(1 notice)
    1 of 140 notices is Selective (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1.5indicative · n=250% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 140 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

02 of 140 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER149.5%1414—
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC LIMITED117.5%1111—
MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST85.4%88—
Oncology Imaging Systems Ltd74.8%77—
Veezu Limited42.7%44—
BOC Ltd32%33—
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust32%33—
Philips Electronics UK Limited21.4%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 22% of 147 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 94 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£28mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 139 of 139 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 83%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£27k middle valuerobust · n=139Middle half £16k–£42k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Total Body PET-CT ScannerUnited Imaging Health Limited14 Jul 20255 yrs · up to 10 yrs£6,500,000
≈ £1.3m/yr
Total Body PET-CT ScannerUnited Imaging Health Limited14 Jul 20255 yrs · up to 10 yrs£6,500,000
≈ £1.3m/yr
Total Body PET-CT ScannerUnited Imaging Health Limited14 Jul 20255 yrs · up to 10 yrs£6,400,000
≈ £1.3m/yr
Measured Term Contract (MTC)Novus Property Solutions Ltd7 Oct 20263 yrs£3,900,000
≈ £1.3m/yr
OFFICE 365 renewalSoftcat Plc—1 yrs£262,283 †
≈ £262k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

148 of 151 contracts carry an end date, 12 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 55 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 158 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
MRA Scan BacklogAwarded / complete19 Oct 2026—
GM E-PortfolioAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Call off Order for Procedure packsAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
Planning Advice - Car Park DAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
Staff and Patient Travel - JulyAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
Staff and Patient Travel - JuneAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
Staff and Patient Travel - AprilAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
Replacement and Upgrade to Emergency LightsAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
NHS SBS Consultancy Support for the GM Procurement ServiceAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
Infrastructure Specialist Service EPRAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
GM Procurement Contribution - April 2026 - March 2027Awarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
Supply and Installation - KLS Martin E9i Operating LightAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
PD Steam Pipe DesignAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
Federation of Specialist Hospitals (FSH) Annual Subscription feesAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
SQL Clone SubscriptionAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
MR Linac BMS Outstation UpgradeAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
Measured Term Contract (MTC)Awarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
PSOGI ConferenceAwarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
Board Development ProgrammeAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
Improvements in Operational Performance - Surv Endoscopy (Bolton)Awarded / complete5 Oct 2026—

Search all 158 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 148 of 151 published contracts have an end date; 12 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.