The Food Standards Agency: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Non-ministerial departmentCentral governmentYorkshire and the HumberYork

Official UK PPONPJRM-6866-LYYX

Open now2next deadline 12 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months51+50% vs prior 12 months (34)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot1.550% single-bid · 10 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share51%of 189 awarded procedures · 69 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

189 awarded tenders, 69 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3826 within 6 months · 3 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£17mnet · on 69 of 69 published values · top 5 = 49%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 85 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(83 notices)
    83 of 85 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(2 notices)
    2 of 85 notices are Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open46%(39 notices)
    39 of 85 notices are Open (46%).
  • Direct award44%(37 notices)
    37 of 85 notices are Direct award (44%).
  • Limited / restricted6%(5 notices)
    5 of 85 notices are Limited / restricted (6%).
  • Route not published4%(3 notices)
    3 of 85 notices are Route not published (4%).
  • Selective1%(1 notice)
    1 of 85 notices is Selective (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1.5robust · n=1050% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

30 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 85 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

031 of 85 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

9.9% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Eville and Jonesframework/DPS on 526836%173—
Fera Science Ltdframework/DPS on 12211.6%14268 Jul 2026
The Social Agency/Basis Social Limited73.7%77—
LGC LIMITED63.2%2729 Apr 2026
HallMark Meat Hygiene Ltd52.6%1730 Sept 2025
IFF Research Ltd52.6%16—
Greenwater31.6%33—
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY TECHNICAL SERVICES LIMITED31.6%33—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 51% of 189 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 69 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£17mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 69 of 69 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 49%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£101k middle valuerobust · n=69Middle half £60k–£200k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Specialist Science and Contingency Services - Food Contingency LaboratoryFera Science Ltd——£3,589,260 †
Environmental Surveillance: OSMA and OSDFera Science Ltd—2.6 yrs · up to 2.8 yrs£1,575,934 †
≈ £610k/yr
Laundry Service Provision in approved establishments in England and WalesElis UK Ltd——£1,353,000 †
PATH-SAFE Genomic Data Platform - Technical StrandUniversity of Oxford7 Sept 20262.5 yrs£967,000
≈ £387k/yr
4-year Fellowship - endpoint toxicity for a mixture of chemicalsUniversity of Birmingham—3.7 yrs · up to 4.2 yrs£663,565 †
≈ £181k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

176 of 202 contracts carry an end date, 24 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 38 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 224 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Food and You 2: Waves 13-16Data collection and collation servicesOpen31 Jul 2026£1,100,000
4-year Fellowship - endpoint toxicity for a mixture of chemicalsResearch and development consultancy servicesAwarded / complete31 Jul 2026£670,000
Audit of the display of food hygiene ratings and associated business attitudesResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesAwarded / complete29 Jul 2026£360,000
WP3:Provision of Allergen Information Evaluation: Stakeholder follow-up researchAwarded / complete27 Jul 2026—
Survey of E. coli, Campylobacter, Salmonella & AMR on frozen chicken2 lotsResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026£180,000
WP2 Exploring awareness and impact of FSA guidance on glycerol slush-ice drinks consumptionAwarded / complete21 Jul 2026—
Improving Local Authority Delivery of Animal Feed and Food Hygiene at the Level of Primary Production Official Controls in 2026-27Awarded / complete10 Jul 2026—
Food Standards training for England Local Authority OfficersAwarded / complete6 Jul 2026—
Making Food Better Consumer TrackerAwarded / complete6 Jul 2026—
Public Analyst TrainingAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
Media BuyingAwarded / complete22 Jun 2026—
Literature Review: Allergenicity of cell cultivated productsResearch and development consultancy servicesAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026£40,000
Workpackage 1: Raw pet food consumer researchAwarded / complete12 Jun 2026—
Meta-analysis of the variability of hemp (Cannabis sativa)Market research servicesPlanning9 Jun 2026£50,000
Bioavailability of Food SupplementsMarket research servicesAwarded / complete4 Jun 2026£300,000
Determination of background levels of PFAS in a variety of foodsAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
Investigating Legume Allergy in the UKResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026£85,000
Survey on contaminants in smoked productsResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026£245,000
Digital Forensic ServicesAwarded / complete12 May 2026—
Food supplements Market insightMarket research servicesAwarded / complete11 May 2026£90,000

Search all 224 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 176 of 202 published contracts have an end date; 24 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.