University of Oxford: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Oxford·South East England·Main market: Data-processing services
Official UK PPONPTVC-9174-PZNM
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
16 awards (15 for a named lot, 94%, 1 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 16 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7231 Data-processing services3 awards · 19% · awards naming a lot4831 Document creation software package1 award · 6% · awards naming a lot7135 Engineering-related scientific and technical services1 award · 6% · awards naming a lot7311 Research services1 award · 6% · awards naming a lot7995 Exhibition, fair and congress organisation services1 award · 6% · awards naming a lot8510 Health services1 award · 6% · awards naming a lot9071 Environmental management1 award · 6% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 1 wins across all categories. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perinatal Mortality Review Tool (PMRT) | Department of Health & Social Care | — | — | £1,500,000 † |
| PATH-SAFE Genomic Data Platform - Technical Strand | The Food Standards Agency | 7 Sept 2026 | 2.5 yrs | £967,000 ≈ £387k/yr |
| Improving the quality of environmental impact data for food | Waste & Resources Action Programme | — | — | £401,000 † |
| DHSC:GH: Fleming Fund Knowledge Hub | Department of Health & Social Care | — | 2 yrs | £300,000 ≈ £150k/yr |
| Understanding the Food System | The Food Standards Agency | — | — | £170,000 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 16 of 16 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Central government56%(9 awards)
9 of 16 awards are Central government (56%).Other public body19%(3 awards)
3 of 16 awards are Other public body (19%).Type not classified19%(3 awards)
3 of 16 awards are Type not classified (19%).NHS & health6%(1 award)
1 of 16 awards is NHS & health (6%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waste & Resources Action Programme | 3 | 18.8% | 3 | 10 Mar 2026 |
| Department of Health & Social Care | 2 | 12.5% | 2 | 25 Mar 2026 |
| The Food Standards Agency | 2 | 12.5% | 2 | 7 Sept 2026 |
| NHS England | 2 | 12.5% | 2 | 9 Oct 2026 |
| UK Research and Innovation | 1 | 6.3% | 1 | 23 Jun 2026 |
| Department for Energy Security & Net Zero | 1 | 6.3% | 1 | 13 Mar 2026 |
| Health Education England | 1 | 6.3% | 1 | 1 Mar 2023 |
| Education Traning Foundation | 1 | 6.3% | 1 | 7 Nov 2022 |
Share = of the 16 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
9 of 16 awards carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| LOT 1 Senior Leadership | 8 Nov 2026 | £4,000,000 |
| CSP26610 - Scalability Conference 2027 | 2 Apr 2027 | £69,026 |
| DHSC:GH: Fleming Fund Knowledge Hub | 31 Mar 2028 | £300,000 |
Recent awards
Latest 16 of 16 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 8 of 16 awards, estimated from the published duration on 1 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.