The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentNorth East EnglandNewcastle-upon-Tyne

Official UK PPONPDCY-5582-YRHQWebsitenewcastle-hospitals.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months60+25% vs prior 12 months (48)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot314.3% single-bid · 14 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share9%of 120 awarded procedures · 182 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

120 awarded tenders, 182 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months93 within 6 months · 5 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£16mnet · on 52 of 52 published values · top 5 = 53%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 108 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract95%(103 notices)
    103 of 108 notices are Contract (95%).
  • Framework5%(5 notices)
    5 of 108 notices are Framework (5%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted44%(48 notices)
    48 of 108 notices are Limited / restricted (44%).
  • Direct award23%(25 notices)
    25 of 108 notices are Direct award (23%).
  • Open17%(18 notices)
    18 of 108 notices are Open (17%).
  • Route not published14%(15 notices)
    15 of 108 notices are Route not published (14%).
  • Selective2%(2 notices)
    2 of 108 notices are Selective (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=1414.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 7 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

85 daysrobust · n=7
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 108 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

011 of 108 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 8 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

8% above estimaterobust · n=8

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Ways to Wellness Limited43.3%44—
Revvity (UK) Ltd.43.3%04—
Elective Services Ltd32.5%33—
Healthworks Newcastle21.7%22—
OUTPATIENT NETWORK LIMITED21.7%22—
deaflink north east21.7%22—
Healthworks21.7%22—
Abiomed21.7%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 120 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 182 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£16mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 52 of 52 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 53%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£134k middle valuerobust · n=52Middle half £75k–£258k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Healthcare Waste Collection, Treatment and Disposal ServicesSharpsmart Limited3 Sept 20264 yrs · up to 5 yrs£3,648,625
≈ £912k/yr
Healthcare Waste Collection, Treatment and Disposal ServicesSUEZ Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd3 Sept 20264 yrs · up to 5 yrs£2,572,252
≈ £643k/yr
Fire Alarm Maintenance Services (Trust-Wide)Pyrocel Limited2 Jun 20262 yrs · up to 4 yrs£782,965
≈ £391k/yr
Sentinel Support & MaintenanceSPECTRUM MEDICAL LIMITED27 Aug 20268.5 yrs£726,848
≈ £86k/yr
Nautilus 835 SolutionAccenture UK Limited12 Nov 20255 yrs£628,425
≈ £126k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

118 of 189 contracts carry an end date, 103 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 174 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Elective Services CardioCardiology servicesAwarded / complete26 Oct 2026—
Air Conditioning and Refrigeration PPM, Servicing and Emergency Call-Out Service5 lotsHeatingAwarded / complete28 Sept 2026£1,200,000
Lovo Med Cell Processing KitsAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Approved Dosimetry ServicesRadiation protection servicesAwarded / complete22 Sept 2026£400,000
NECTAR Electronic Patient RecordPatient-administration systemOpen22 Sept 2026£150,000
Healthcare Waste Collection, Treatment and Disposal Services2 lotsCollectionAwarded / complete7 Sept 2026£4,500,000
SPACE Project - Ways to WellnessHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
TPIAT ServiceHealth servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
Sentinel Support & MaintenanceAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
Fibroscanner LeasesAwarded / complete21 Aug 2026—
XVIVO EVLP Launch ProgrammeAwarded / complete21 Aug 2026—
Ways to WellnessHealth servicesAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
Waiting WellHealth servicesAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
Retail VouchersAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026—
Cardiology InsourcingCardiology servicesAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
Cellular PathologyHealth servicesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—
Systemic Anti Cancer TherapyHealth servicesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—
Paediatric Diabetes Network SupportHealth servicesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—
Laboratory Services Freeman HospitalServices provided by medical laboratoriesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—
Lab Services RVI - SQCLServices provided by medical laboratoriesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—

Search all 174 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 118 of 189 published contracts have an end date; 103 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.