The Royal Air Force Museum: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Royal Charter CompanyGOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCharityGreater LondonLONDON

Companies HouseRC000922 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months8+700% vs prior 12 months (1)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Contracts ending ≤18 months33 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£551knet · on 8 of 8 published values · top 5 = 81%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 9 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(9 notices)
    9 of 9 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted67%(6 notices)
    6 of 9 notices are Limited / restricted (67%).
  • Direct award11%(1 notice)
    1 of 9 notices is Direct award (11%).
  • Open11%(1 notice)
    1 of 9 notices is Open (11%).
  • Route not published11%(1 notice)
    1 of 9 notices is Route not published (11%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

12indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 9 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 9 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
McPhillips (Wellington) Limited222.2%22—
Softcat Plc111.1%11—
VISO GROUP LTD111.1%11—
Insulation Contracting Services Ltd111.1%11—
MEL Research Ltd111.1%1117 Dec 2025
Dexion Material Handling Ltd t/a CSI111.1%1112 Nov 2025
Bruynzeel Storage Systems Limited111.1%11—
APPLEYARD & TREW LLPframework/DPS on 1111.1%01—

9 awarded procedures across 10 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£551kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 8 of 8 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 81%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£45k middle valuerobust · n=8Middle half £40k–£87k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
24/7 365 IT Security Operations CentreSoftcat Plc—3 yrs£150,000 †
≈ £50k/yr
Collections Hub Racking and ShelvingDexion Material Handling Ltd t/a CSI—7 mo£137,500
Fire Door Replacement and Remedial WorksVISO GROUP LTD—4 mo£70,568 †
MDP Enabling Package 3 - Collections Hub Himalayan BalsamMcPhillips (Wellington) Limited—2 mo£45,500 †
Evaluation Consultant - Inspiring Everyone: RAF Museum Midlands Development ProgrammeMEL Research Ltd17 Dec 20252.8 yrs · up to 2.9 yrs£45,000
≈ £16k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

8 of 8 contracts carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 14 of 14 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Evaluation Consultant - Inspiring Everyone: RAF Museum Midlands Development ProgrammeEvaluation consultancy servicesAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026£45,000
MDP Enabling Works 10 - Asbestos RemovalAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
MDP Enabling Works 1 - Cable identification and heating pipesAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
MDP Enabling Package 3 - Collections Hub Himalayan BalsamAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
RAF Museum Replacement 4D Theatre AttractionAudio-visual equipmentPlanning5 Oct 2026—
Fire Door Replacement and Remedial WorksAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Armoury RackingAwarded / complete12 Jun 2026—
24/7 365 IT Security Operations CentreAwarded / complete8 Jun 2026—
Collections Hub Racking and ShelvingAwarded / complete12 Nov 2025—
Digital Marketing Services - RAF Museumcentral purchasing bodyAdvertising and marketing servicesOpen7 Nov 2023£750,000
Security Services - RAF Museumcentral purchasing bodySecurity servicesOpen28 Sept 2023£735,000
Provision of Security ServicesSecurity servicesOpen11 Sept 2023—
Provision of Quantity Surveyor ServicesFrameworkcentral purchasing bodyQuantity surveying servicesAwarded / complete7 Nov 2022£5,000,000
RAF Museum Cleaning ServicesBuilding-cleaning servicesOpen27 Sept 2021£2,350,000

Search all 14 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 8 of 8 published contracts have an end date; 1 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.