The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentNorth West EnglandFrzakerleyRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPYLD-6221-NJVPWebsitethewaltoncentre.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months44+1000% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share16%of 44 awarded procedures · 38 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

44 awarded tenders, 38 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months209 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£5.0mnet · on 44 of 44 published values · top 5 = 73%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 48 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(48 notices)
    48 of 48 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award83%(40 notices)
    40 of 48 notices are Direct award (83%).
  • Route not published10%(5 notices)
    5 of 48 notices are Route not published (10%).
  • Selective4%(2 notices)
    2 of 48 notices are Selective (4%).
  • Open2%(1 notices)
    1 of 48 notices are Open (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 47 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 47 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
X-Lab Limited36.8%3328 Jan 2026
Feedwater Ltd24.5%22—
MY HAPPY MIND LIMITED24.5%22—
First Step Group Ltd24.5%2219 Mar 2026
Renishaw Neuro Solutions Limited24.5%22—
Inomed Neurocare Limited12.3%125 Oct 2026
Softcat Plc12.3%11—
Water Plus Limited12.3%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 16% of 44 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 38 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£5.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 44 of 44 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 73%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£20k middle valuerobust · n=44Middle half £12k–£65k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of Occupational Health ServicesLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust——£2,206,284 †
Solar PV Installation ProjectMitie Limited—1 mo£800,000 †
Turnkey works required for installation of 3T MRIGE Healthcare—2 mo£317,500 †
Springfield Gardens DrainageFirst Step Group Ltd—5 mo£150,000 †
Springfield Park DrainageFirst Step Group Ltd—4 mo£150,000

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

43 of 43 contracts carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 20 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 52 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Ensemble E2Awarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Service agreement for JEM1400 electron microscopeAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
Service Contract for SUSy Sterotactic SystemAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
EVOLUTION ONE SPECTROPHOTOMETERAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
Provision of cleaning services Burlington HouseAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
Service Contract VentilationAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa SamplingAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Maintenance Contract Neuromate and NeuroInspireAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Alarm system for Anti-Ligature DoorsAwarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
Digital appAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
Virtual Environment Rehabilitation Assistant (VERA) supportAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026—
PPM Service ContractAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
Out Patient VinylsAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
Cercare MedicalAwarded / complete31 Jul 2026—
Electrical ServicesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—
Citizen UKAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
Service ChargeAwarded / complete17 Jul 2026—
Water BudgetAwarded / complete17 Jul 2026—
Surface WaterAwarded / complete17 Jul 2026—
AirconditioningAwarded / complete16 Jul 2026—

Search all 52 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 43 of 43 published contracts have an end date; 1 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.