Warrington and Halton Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Central governmentNorth West EnglandWarrINGTON

Official UK PPONPBMJ-3394-DBQQWebsitewhh.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months48-27% vs prior 12 months (66)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot180% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share7%of 110 awarded procedures · 94 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

110 awarded tenders, 94 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2415 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£87mnet · on 108 of 108 published values · top 5 = 94%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 114 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(114 notices)
    114 of 114 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award72%(82 notices)
    82 of 114 notices are Direct award (72%).
  • Limited / restricted18%(21 notices)
    21 of 114 notices are Limited / restricted (18%).
  • Route not published6%(7 notices)
    7 of 114 notices are Route not published (6%).
  • Open4%(4 notices)
    4 of 114 notices are Open (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1robust · n=580% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

6 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 114 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 114 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 7% of 110 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 94 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£87mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 108 of 108 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 94%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£29k middle valuerobust · n=108Middle half £16k–£64k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Pathology ServicesNHS Mersey & West Lancashire NHS Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust——£75,000,000 †
NHS Cheshire and Merseyside Integrated Care Board (ICB) - Radiation Protection ServicesIntegrated Radiological Services (IRS) Ltd—2.8 yrs · up to 3.8 yrs£4,000,000 †
≈ £1.5m/yr
ENT and Ear Care ServiceWidnes Highfield Health——£1,010,500 †
Supply of Blood Components, Reagents and ServicesNHS Blood and Transplant——£950,000 †
Elective restoration and recovery for provision of planned and unplanned carePentara Limited Liability Partnership——£850,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

91 of 110 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 24 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 116 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Maintenance to nurse call systemsAwarded / complete26 Nov 2025—
Installation of wood dust local extract ventilation machineAwarded / complete18 Nov 2025—
Provision of Remedial Repairs to Fire DampersAwarded / complete31 Oct 2025—
Provision of Civica Declare LicenceAwarded / complete31 Oct 2025—
Provision of Design & Project Management FeesAwarded / complete31 Oct 2025—
Provision of Analogue phone lineAwarded / complete31 Oct 2025—
Renewal of Cority software and subscription licenceAwarded / complete31 Oct 2025—
Provision of NLP Master Practitioner CourseAwarded / complete31 Oct 2025—
Support and Maintenance of Pathology Quality Management SystemAwarded / complete30 Oct 2025—
Provision of Maintenance of Bed Pan MaceratorsAwarded / complete20 Oct 2025—

Search all 116 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 91 of 110 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.