Elite Training and Consultancy (Scotland) Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyGlasgowNationwide (UK)Main market: Specialist training services

Companies HouseSC303680 ↗

Procedures with an award712 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities6named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£60knet · on 1 of 12 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months1award · 4 in the prior 24 months · last 4 Dec 2025
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months5end date on 9 of 12 awards · 3 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions3most often Scotland
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

12 awards (12 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 12 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

8051 Specialist training services4 awards · 33% · awards naming a lot
8042 E-learning services3 awards · 25% · awards naming a lot
8050 Training services3 awards · 25% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£60kOn 1 of 12 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 80). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 80
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Project Management Training MKCC StaffMilton Keynes Council—1 yrs · up to 3 yrs£60,000 †
≈ £60k/yr

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 7 of 7 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Scotland5 procedures · 71%
East Midlands1 procedure · 14%
South East England1 procedure · 14%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notice names this supplier since 6 Feb 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

0 won · 0 lostFewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Framework / DPS places
i

Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.

Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.

1 of 1
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

1
NoticeAuthorityOutcomeBiddersPublished
383_25 Managed Learning Servicesframework/DPSLeicestershire County Council, trading as ESPOappointed156 Feb 2026

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Local authority67%(8 awards)
    8 of 12 awards are Local authority (67%).
  • Education17%(2 awards)
    2 of 12 awards are Education (17%).
  • Type not classified17%(2 awards)
    2 of 12 awards are Type not classified (17%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
The Scottish Sports Council trading as sportscotlandframework/DPS on 2228.6%68 Sept 2025
Glasgow Kelvin Collegeframework/DPS on 1114.3%25 May 2023
Milton Keynes Council114.3%127 May 2025
Strathclyde Partnership for Transportframework/DPS on 1114.3%110 Oct 2022
Scottish Governmentframework/DPS on 1114.3%19 Oct 2023
Leicestershire County Council, trading as ESPOframework/DPS on 1114.3%14 Dec 2025

Share = of the 7 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

9 of 12 awards carry an end date, 6 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
Project Delivery Training Framework6 Nov 2026£300,000
Lot 1: Driving business success in sport29 Aug 2027 estimated£176,000
Lot 2: Enhancing communication skills29 Aug 2027 estimated£110,000
Lot 3: Developing personal effectiveness skills29 Aug 2027 estimated£110,000
Lot 1. Managed Service Provider (MSP)1 Jan 2028£90,000,000

Recent awards

Latest 12 of 12 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Lot 1. Managed Service Provider (MSP)Leicestershire County Council, trading as ESPO4 Dec 2025£90,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 9 appointed suppliers
Lot 1: Driving business success in sportThe Scottish Sports Council trading as sportscotlandNot published£176,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 6 appointed suppliers
Lot 2: Enhancing communication skillsThe Scottish Sports Council trading as sportscotlandNot published£110,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Lot 3: Developing personal effectiveness skillsThe Scottish Sports Council trading as sportscotlandNot published£110,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 5 appointed suppliers
Project Management Training MKCC StaffMilton Keynes CouncilNot published£60,000 †
from the contract notice
Project Delivery Training FrameworkScottish GovernmentNot published£300,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
Leadership, Management, Business SkillsGlasgow Kelvin CollegeNot publishedNot published
Computing & ITGlasgow Kelvin CollegeNot publishedNot published
Procured Service Arrangement for the Provision of TrainingStrathclyde Partnership for TransportNot published£1,200,000 †
dynamic market estimate · 1 of 24 suppliers
Business Skills DevelopmentThe Scottish Sports Council trading as sportscotlandNot publishedNot published
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 3 of 12 awards, estimated from the published duration on 6 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.