KUBUS GROUP LIMITED: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyCirencesterSouth West EnglandMain market: Local area network

Companies House04197529 ↗

Procedures with an award55 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities5named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£195knet · on 4 of 5 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months3awards · 2 in the prior 24 months · last 20 Jul 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3end date on 5 of 5 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions3most often South West England
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

5 awards (5 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 5 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

3241 Local area network1 award · 20% · awards naming a lot
3242 Network equipment1 award · 20% · awards naming a lot
4821 Networking software package1 award · 20% · awards naming a lot
7226 Software-related services1 award · 20% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£195kOn 4 of 5 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£36k middle valuemoderate · n=4
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 32). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

21% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 32
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Fortinet products v2Bracknell Forest Council—5 yrs£94,813 †
≈ £19k/yr
ITEP1050 - LTC023: BIM Collab Zoom, Nexus & Zoom 2025 renewalNational Highways Limited—1 yrs£43,228 †
≈ £43k/yr
Automated Penetration Testing ToolDe Montfort University—1 yrs£28,639 †
≈ £29k/yr
PAR-SUP-SRX320JSBUniversity of the West of England—1 yrs£27,913 †
≈ £28k/yr

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 4 of 5 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

South West England2 procedures · 50%
East Midlands1 procedure · 25%
West Midlands1 procedure · 25%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Central government20%(1 award)
    1 of 5 awards is Central government (20%).
  • Charity20%(1 award)
    1 of 5 awards is Charity (20%).
  • Education20%(1 award)
    1 of 5 awards is Education (20%).
  • Local authority20%(1 award)
    1 of 5 awards is Local authority (20%).
  • Type not classified20%(1 award)
    1 of 5 awards is Type not classified (20%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Bracknell Forest Council120%120 Jul 2026
National Highways Limited120%131 Oct 2025
De Montfort University120%121 Oct 2025
University of the West of England120%124 Nov 2025
Jisc Services Limitedframework/DPS on 1120%131 May 2025

Share = of the 5 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

5 of 5 awards carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
ITEP1050 - BIM Collab Zoom, Nexus & Zoom 2025 renewal30 Oct 2026£43,228
Automated Penetration Testing Tool31 Oct 2026£28,639
PAR-SUP-SRX320JSB24 Dec 2026£27,913

Recent awards

Latest 5 of 5 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Fortinet products v2Bracknell Forest CouncilNot published£94,813 †
from the contract notice
PAR-SUP-SRX320JSBUniversity of the West of EnglandNot published£27,913 †
from the contract notice
Automated Penetration Testing ToolDe Montfort UniversityNot published£28,639 †
from the contract notice
ITEP1050 - LTC023: BIM Collab Zoom, Nexus & Zoom 2025 renewalNational Highways LimitedNot published£43,228 †
from the contract notice
Lot 4 JuniperJisc Services LimitedNot published£160,000,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 4 of 5 awards, estimated from the published duration on 1 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.