Find a TenderAwarded
Published 5 Dec 2023, 17:50 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Community Health and Wellbeing Service

Official notice

Authority: Leeds City Council (Local council)

ServicesOpen procedure
Published estimate£5,730,000≈ £3.8m / year40.1% above final estimate
Submissions closed 29 Jan 2024awarded 27 Jun 2024
Awarded to Be Caring Ltd, Springfield Home Care Services Limited
Contract term 1 yr 6 moends 15 Mar 2026 · starts 16 Sept 2024

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Community Health and Wellbeing Service (CHWS) is a transformational approach to delivering health and care services at home, delivered by a collaborative partnership of contracted Providers working together on a neighbourhood basis.

CPV: Health and social work services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Community Health and Wellbeing Service 1 yr 6 moPublished value£5,730,000
Contract period: 16 Sept 2024 – 15 Mar 2026 (1 yr 6 mo)
Delivery: Yorkshire & Humber · Leeds
Variant bids: not allowed

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record · publisher note attached
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Awarded
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
No (one-off requirement)
First published
5 Dec 2023, 17:50 GMT
Last source update
16 Apr 2026, 13:24 BST
Award evaluation window
29 Jan 2024 – …
Authority reference
81733
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-034695
Classification (CPV)
Health and social work services
Delivery area
Yorkshire & Humber (UKE42)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0421ee Find a Tender
Review and risk notes
Review procedure

The authority will incorporate a minimum 10 calendar day standstill period at the point information on the award of the contract is communicated to tenderers. This period allows unsuccessful tenderers to seek further information from the contracting authority before the contract is entered into.

Such additional information should be requested from the addressee found in I.1. If an appeal regarding the award of a contract has not been successfully resolved the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No 102) provide for aggrieved parties who have been harmed or are at risk of harm by a breach of the rules to take action in the High Court (England, Wales and Northern Ireland). Any such action must be brought promptly (within 30 days beginning with the date when the economic operator first knew or ought to have known that grounds for such action had arisen).

Where a contract has not been entered into the court may order the setting aside of the award decision or order the authority to amend any document and may award damages. Following the correct implementation of a10 day standstill period and publication of appropriate notices the court may only award damages once the contract has been entered into

Publisher note: Under Regulation 72 (1) (b) contracts and framework agreements may be modified without a new procurement procedure in accordance with this Part in any of the following cases: - “(b) for additional works, services or supplies by the original contractor that have become necessary and were not included in the initial procurement where a change of contractor – (i) cannot be made for economic or technical reasons such as requirements of interchangeability or interoperability with existing equipment, services or installations procured under the initial procurement, and (ii) would cause significant inconvenience or substantial duplication of costs for the contracting authority, provided that any increase in price does not exceed 50% of the value of the original contract;” Regulation 72 (1) (b) (i) & (ii) are deemed to be satisfied for the following reasons: (i) Changes to contractors cannot be made at this stage due to the specialist and technical knowledge of the CHWS Providers as they are testing out a different way of delivering homecare from other Providers. This includes undertaking Delegated Healthcare activity whereby the CHWS Provider staff have been trained to deliver certain healthcare tasks. It would not be feasible within the timescales prior to the recommissioning of citywide homecare to move this to other providers. It would also impact continuity for people using the service. The CHWS Providers are also working more closely with Social Work teams and Occupational Therapists that are based within the specific geographical pilot area with established communication routes and processes, along with the ability to right size packages through a trusted reviewer approach. This is something that is not currently applicable to other homecare Providers. In addition, part of the CHWS contract is around fostering community connections. As such, Pilot providers have been building links and relationships with other organisations in that area in addition to acquiring sound knowledge of the community assets– this would take too much time to replicate if the Providers were to change for such a short, interim period. Modifying the contract maintains separation from citywide provision which allows for clearer comparison and evaluation. The on-going pilot feeds in well to the concept of a locality model which is the basis on which the Council aspires to commission homecare in future across the city. (ii) Terminating the CHWS contract and putting another one in place would have both resource and cost implications for the Council. Due to the nature of the pilot, a significant level of mobilisation would be required if Providers were to be changed. This would cause significant disruption to people in receipt of the service and their family carers, as their support would need to be brokered to other Providers. Many of these people have already moved once to the CHWS providers – so having to move again could impact their wellbeing. The current provider is well-integrated and positioned to deliver this service. A change in provider for this interim period prior to the tender process for citywide homecare provision is therefore not feasible in terms of timescales and resources. he original contract value was £5,730,000 with the indicative value for this modification being £2,300,000 which is 40% and therefore meets this condition.

How it was run

Official notice
Run through: EU-Supply (CTM) · Who buys & how to bid on EU-Supply
Public notice page · account needed to bidLanguage: EN
Access & registration note: Free · 5–10 minutes
Submission deadline
29 Jan 2024, 12:00 GMT
Submission channel
{"electronicSubmission","written"}
Accepted languages
en
Bids opened
29 Jan 2024, 12:00 GMT
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release

Timeline

29 Jan 2024 → 16 Apr 2026 · 4 dates
  1. Submission deadline
    29 Jan 2024, 12:00 GMT
  2. Bids opened
    29 Jan 2024, 12:00 GMT
  3. Contract starts
    16 Sept 2024, 00:00 BST
  4. Notice published195 days ago
    16 Apr 2026, 13:24 BST

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast
Awards 1
Awarded value £8,030,0001 contract exc. VAT
Contracts signed 1latest 27 Jun 2024
Awarded toValueDateStatus
Be Caring Ltd, Springfield Home Care Services Limitedjoint award£8,030,000 †—Awarded

Contracts

  • Community Health and Wellbeing Service · Be Caring Ltd, Springfield Home Care Services Limited

    Signed
    27 Jun 2024
    Value
    £8,030,000
    Period
    … – 15 Mar 2026
    Status
    active
    • Change conditions of Regulation 72 (1) (b) (i) & (ii) are deemed to be satisfied for the following reasons: (i) Changes to contractors cannot be made at this stage due to the specialist and technical knowledge of the CHWS Providers as they are testing out a different way of delivering homecare from other Providers. This includes undertaking Delegated Healthcare activity whereby the CHWS Provider staff have been trained to deliver certain healthcare tasks. It would not be feasible within the timescales prior to the recommissioning of citywide homecare to move this to other providers. It would also impact continuity for people using the service. (ii) Terminating the CHWS contract and putting another one in place would have both resource and cost implications for the Council. Due to the nature of the pilot, a significant level of mobilisation would be required if Providers were to be changed., Need for additional works, services or supplies by the original contractor/concessionaire: (i) Changes to contractors cannot be made at this stage due to the specialist and technical knowledge of the CHWS Providers as they are testing out a different way of delivering homecare from other Providers. This includes undertaking Delegated Healthcare activity whereby the CHWS Provider staff have been trained to deliver certain healthcare tasks. It would not be feasible within the timescales prior to the recommissioning of citywide homecare to move this to other providers. It would also impact continuity for people using the service.

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Leeds City Council

Contracting authorityLocal CouncilRegional or local authorityGeneral public services 171459162 Civic Hall, 3rd Floor West, , Leeds, Yorkshire & Humber, LS1 1URContact name, email, phone Published organisation website ↗

Dispute resolution & review bodies

  • The High Court of JusticeReview body London

Bidders & participating suppliers

4 commercial parties on the notice

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Tender pack and attachments

  • Economic and financial selection criteriatenderEconomic and financial selection criteria
  • Technical selection criteriatenderTechnical selection criteria