Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 23 Jul 2026, 14:10 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Independent Travel Training App

Authority: Essex County Council (Local council)

Services
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 4 yrsends 31 Dec 2030 · starts 1 Jan 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Essex County Council's Travel Training team are seeking a new front-ended Travel Training app, for our Travel Trainers, Students and Parents/Carers, with an accompanying back-ended management platform. This is to replace the current desktop system that the team currently operates and to reduce the administrative pressure of it via a simple app. This new and modern system, which incorporates the functional requirements (outlined below) of ECC's travel training systems will help improve users (outlined below) experience and improve ECC's efficiency across ECCs teams, from reduced administrative pressure from a simplified app.

Users:

  1. Travel Trainers - the Travel Trainer / Staff portal will be the detailed area and will be the one stop shop for all the resources and tools our Travel Trainers require.
  2. Students - the Student Portal will be the simplest version of the app, since most of our students are SEN, it is vital that we make the app seamless and not overcomplicate their experience.
  3. Parents / Carers - the Parent and Carer portal will be a place where they can view the progress of the student conducting travel training.

Objectives and Success Criteria:

Success looks like a clear and user-friendly app interface, incorporating the functional requirements outlined in this document.

  1. Improved operational efficiency - The aim of this app is to help improve efficiency across the Travel Training service, thus freeing up time for the Travel Trainers to conduct more sessions, rather than taking up their time on administrative duties. The functional requirements listed below will help us achieve this.
  2. Enhanced user experience - provide a clear, intuitive and accessible interface for Travel Trainers, Students and Parents/Carers, creating a simple and engaging experience. Additionally, improving communication between the Travel Trainers, Students and Parents/Carers.
  3. Improved data, reporting and performance management - capture all service activity within a single platform, providing automated KPI and management reporting. This will help enable evidence-based service improvement and ensure we are enhancing efficiency and user experience.
  4. Improved safeguarding and compliance - ensure GDPR and data protection compliance, maintain secure access controls and audit trails. Support safeguarding requirements for children and vulnerable learners. Also providing easy access to policies, guidance and terms of use.

Functional Requirements:

Procurement or development of a Travel Training app, incorporating the below requirements and also an indicative system diagram.

  1. Reporting, KPIs and Evaluation - the ability to be able to pull out reporting from the data within the app. For example, number of travel training sessions per student or the number of completed students for each month.
  2. Calendar / Diary management - ability to book in Travel Training sessions and email/text the booking to the student/parent/carer. This means that once a referral has been completed by a student, parent or carer, this will be allocated directly to a Travel Trainer and placed into their calendar, rather than an administration officer having to allocate. Equally, Travel Trainers will be able to manage their calendar/diary directly from the app, whilst also being uploaded to the Outlook calendar.
  3. Evidence - ability for the Travel Trainer to upload and manage the evidence of Travel Training sessions. This could be done in a variety of forms, such as text, pictures, voice notes or diagrams. There would also be a requirement for there to be a checklist, to ensure that all the required evidence has been uploaded, checked off and standardised for ease of reporting. This would be only viewed by the Travel Training team.
  4. Alerts - automatic alerts to be sent to the student and parents to remind them that they have a Travel Training session for the next day. Equally, Travel Trainers would also get notifications on new referrals or sessions that come through via the app or text message.
  5. Offline functionality - requirement to be able to view the information whilst being offline, due to the nature of travel training sometimes being in more rural areas. Also be able to upload evidence whilst offline but then it uploads once there is a internet connection.
  6. Desktop and Phone - the app to be viewable on both a mobile phone and a desktop.
  7. Virtual Training - a portal for Trainers to access, which will include the latest e-learning training for the Travel Trainers.
  8. Mail out - ability to do a multi-contact email out to parents and students, to update them or send useful resources.
  9. Student and Parent interface - an ability for the student and parents to have a different level of access, meeting their requirements specified below. Whereby they can view their appointments, access learning materials and contact the Travel Trainers direct.
  10. National Alerts - integration with weather and national strike alerts, to help keep students, parents and travel trainers informed.
  11. Ability for the app to work on both iOS and Android devices.
  12. Section of the app dedicated to terms of use and our policies related to Essex County Council's travel training for the Travel Trainers, Students and Parent/Carers, such as our safeguarding statement, policies and guidance of conduct.
  13. Automatic feedback form to be sent to parents/carer after a successful completion of the student's travel training. A follow up feedback form to then be sent to the parent/carer one month after completion to check in on the student. This data will then be fed back into the KPI reporting system.

Travel Trainer interface:

Reporting, KPI and Evaluation section

Calendar / diary management section

Evidence upload section, with option to toggle internal/external visibility

Travel Trainers to receive automatic text alerts on new referrals

Offline functionality

App to be viewable on both a mobile phone and desktop

Portal for Travel Trainer's e-learning

Multi-contact mail out to parents/carers and students

Section of the app dedicated to terms of use and our policies related to Essex County Council's travel training

Option to add feedback which can be seen by the Parent/Carer on Students progress

Student and Parent/Carer interface:

Both student and parent/carer to receive an automatic text alert about their next Travel Training session

Offline functionality

App to be viewable on both a mobile phone and desktop

View upcoming travel training sessions via a calendar

National alerts integration with weather and national strikes

Ability to receive feedback from Travel Trainers

Non-Functional Requirements

Performance:

  • App needs to be scalable, meaning that we could in the future add more to the app. Equally the app needs to be able to work efficiently and effectively, so it is a tool rather than a burden to staff.

Security:

  • General IT security needs to be considered, especially as this is including sensitive information of members of the public. Therefore, we would need to incorporate GDPR, data protection and access control.
  • Safeguarding is especially important for this app, as this will be used by students and under 18s. Therefore, this will need to be implemented into the app software.

CPV: IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Essex County Council buys IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72), and who usually turns up

Essex County Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerEssex County Council · division 72
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 8 of 14 known-size awards · market: division 72 · East of England, n=513
57%39%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in East of England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 6 of 25 known-location awards · market: division 72 · East of England, n=616
24%11%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 72 · East of England, n=56
—62 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 62 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 15 of 27 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 72 · East of England, n=782
56%60%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 72
0% had one bid
The market81 lots with bid counts · division 72 · East of England
7% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0% / 7%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 6 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
2–320% / 26%
Buyer: 1 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 21 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
4–640% / 37%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 30 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
7+40% / 30%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 24 of 81 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer58 lots with estimate and award · all categories
38% below estimate
The market65 lots with estimate and award · division 72 · East of England
42% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate38% / 42%
Buyer: 22 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 27 of 65 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%55% / 40%
Buyer: 32 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 26 of 65 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate7% / 18%
Buyer: 4 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 12 of 65 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 7248 monthsEstimate not published

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 72. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 81 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet7% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 81 similar lots
1 bid7%
6 of 81 similar past lots received 1 bid (7%).
2–326%
21 of 81 similar past lots received 2–3 (26%).
4–637%
30 of 81 similar past lots received 4–6 (37%).
7+30%
24 of 81 similar past lots received 7+ (30%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
23 Jul 2026, 14:10 BST
Last source update
23 Jul 2026, 14:10 BST
Authority reference
D115PA
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-069764
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Delivery area
East of England (UKH)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06d20a Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

23 Jul 2026 → 1 Jan 2027 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published96 days ago
    23 Jul 2026, 14:10 BST
  2. Market engagement82 days ago
    6 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST

    Please answer the following questions and send any responses to rachael.flynn@essex.gov.uk.

    1. How could you deliver the functional requirements for this app and are there any constraints or dependencies for each requirement?
    2. Would this be a white-label product or developed bespoke?
    3. Details on delivery approach, including timelines, resourcing and onboarding for the app.
    4. List any support and maintenance provided by yourselves for the app, e.g. SLAs, service uptime guarantee, helpdesk, fixes etc.
    5. List any potential additional features you could add onto the functional requirements, for launch or in the future of the app.
    6. Outline your commercial/pricing model for app implementation and any on-going fees associated with it.
    7. If applicable, show an existing product, if you intend to use it for this requirement.
    8. Please feel free to add in any questions or queries you may have with the above specification for the app.
  3. Today
    28 Oct 2026
  4. Contract startsin 64 days
    1 Jan 2027

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    23 Jul 2026, 14:10 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Essex County Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PWVM-4844-NRQH County Hall, Market Road, Chelmsford, East of England, CM1 1QHContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure