Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 6 May 2026, 08:49 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Pre paid card system for use with children and young people who are looked after and care leavers

Authority: Somerset Council (Local council)

ServicesBelow thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 yrends 31 Aug 2027 · starts 1 Sept 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Somerset Council is undertaking soft market testing to inform the potential future procurement of a pre paid card system for use with children and young people who are looked after and care leavers.

The Authority is exploring alternatives to current cash based arrangements, with the aim of improving safeguarding, financial oversight, operational efficiency, and outcomes for young people. A 12 month pilot is being considered to assess feasibility, usage, and value for money.

This exercise is non binding, will not form part of any evaluation, and will be used solely to shape the Authority's commissioning and procurement approach.

What is needed:

The proposed solution would be used by:

  • Young people and care leavers (typically aged 16-25)
  • Social workers and leaving care professionals authorised to allocate and monitor funds

The system would support:

  • One off and recurring payments
  • Day to day living expenses
  • Reduced reliance on cash payments

CPV: IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 1 yrSME
Contract period: 1 Sept 2026 – 31 Aug 2027 (1 yr)
Delivery: South WestEligibility: SME eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Somerset Council buys IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72), and who usually turns up

Somerset Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerSomerset Council · division 72
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 of 8 known-size awards · market: division 72 · South West England, n=514
63%38%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in South West England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 9 known-location awards · market: division 72 · South West England, n=635
22%9%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 72 · South West England, n=54
—63 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 63 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 9 of 10 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 72 · South West England, n=810
90%64%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer55 lots with bid counts · all categories
36% had one bid
The market81 lots with bid counts · division 72 · South West England
10% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid36% / 10%
Buyer: 20 of 55 lots with published bid counts. Market: 8 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
2–325% / 23%
Buyer: 14 of 55 lots with published bid counts. Market: 19 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
4–620% / 27%
Buyer: 11 of 55 lots with published bid counts. Market: 22 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
7+18% / 40%
Buyer: 10 of 55 lots with published bid counts. Market: 32 of 81 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer19 lots with estimate and award · all categories
37% below estimate
The market69 lots with estimate and award · division 72 · South West England
39% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate37% / 39%
Buyer: 7 of 19 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 27 of 69 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%53% / 45%
Buyer: 10 of 19 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 31 of 69 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate11% / 16%
Buyer: 2 of 19 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 11 of 69 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 7212 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 72. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 81 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet10% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 81 similar lots
1 bid10%
8 of 81 similar past lots received 1 bid (10%).
2–323%
19 of 81 similar past lots received 2–3 (23%).
4–627%
22 of 81 similar past lots received 4–6 (27%).
7+40%
32 of 81 similar past lots received 7+ (40%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
6 May 2026, 08:49 BST
Last source update
6 May 2026, 08:49 BST
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-041290
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Delivery area
South West (UKK23)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0691f4 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

6 May 2026 → 1 Sept 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published176 days ago
    6 May 2026, 08:49 BST
  2. Market engagement156 days ago
    25 May 2026, 23:59 BST

    This request for expressions of interest is issued solely for the purpose of conducting market engagement and does not constitute any commitment by the Authority to undertake any procurement exercise in the future. This exercise includes no element of supplier evaluation. No parties will be prejudiced by any response or failure to respond to this by the deadline, there is no commitment of any kind involved on either side. This request does not constitute a call for competition to procure any services and the Authority is not bound by any proposal offered.

    If you are interested in this potential opportunity, then please express an interest by 25th May 2026 at 12:00pm by email to: stephen.barker@somerset.gov.uk and provide responses to the following questions:

    Core Functionality

    1. Please describe your pre paid card solution, including:

    o Type of card provided

    o Where and how the card can be used (in store, online, ATM access, etc.)

    o Availability of contactless and chip and PIN functionality

    1. Can cards be issued individually and replaced if lost or stolen?

    o Please describe the process and timescales.

    Controls and Safeguarding

    1. What controls are available to the Authority, for example:

    o Spending category or merchant controls

    o Transaction limits

    o Temporary suspension or cancellation

    1. How does your system support safeguarding and fraud prevention?
    2. How does your solution ensure compliance with GDPR and UK data protection requirements?

    Practitioner Experience

    1. Describe the system available to authorised staff, including:
    • How funds are allocated or topped up
    • Access to balances and transaction history
    • User permission controls
    1. What training and support do you provide to practitioners?

    Young Person Experience

    1. How do young people access and manage their account (e.g. app, online portal, statements)?
    2. How does your solution support financial independence and confidence?
    3. What accessibility features are available (e.g. simple language, support needs, digital inclusion)?

    Implementation and Pilot Delivery

    1. What would a typical implementation look like for a local authority pilot?
    • Onboarding timescales
    • Card rollout process
    • Support arrangements

    Commercial Model (Indicative)

    1. Please outline your pricing model
    2. Onboarding timescales
    • Support arrangements
    • Training/roll out delivery

    Experience and Case Studies

    1. Please provide brief examples of:
    • Similar services delivered
    • Outcomes achieved
    • Lessons learned from pilots or live implementations

    Thank you

  3. Contract starts58 days ago
    1 Sept 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    6 May 2026, 08:49 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Somerset Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PPGC-1434-MQPJ County Hall, The Crescent, Taunton, South West, TA1 4DYContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure