Official UK procurement notice
Whole Body Monitors and Continuous Air Monitors for Alpha/Beta Radiation Facility
Authority: UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER (Education)
What is being bought2 lots · detail below
Published requirement descriptionThe University wishes to appoint a Contractor or Contractors to supply a suite of Whole Body Radiation Monitors and Continuous Air Monitors to be housed at the Nuclear Fuel Centre at the Henry Royce Hub Building in Manchester. These systems are intended to support routine radiation safety procedures for lab spaces involved in the handling of alpha and beta radiation emitting uranic and trans-uranic materials.
CPV: Laboratory, optical and precision equipments (excl. glasses) · Nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological protection equipment
Lots and requirements (2)Procurement structure
2 lots · no lot values published · win at most 2 of them · same evaluation weights on every lotLot #1Whole Body Monitors (WBM)Cancelled
Lot #2Continuous Air Monitoring SystemsCancelled
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published award criteria (2)
- Quality: 80
- Price: 20
- Price carries 20 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 2 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Awarded
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 3 Dec 2021, 15:15 GMT
- Last source update
- 24 Feb 2022, 13:39 GMT
- Award evaluation window
- 20 Dec 2021 – …
- Authority reference
2021/1831/WBMCAM/MS/MW- FTS notice number
2022/S 000-005153- Accelerated
Please note that the University of Manchester is running this procurement under an open accelerated Procedure under Regulation 27(5) of the Public Contract Regulations. This is due to the state of urgency connected with the delivery of the research outcomes and adherence to funding requirements.
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-02fd1aFind a Tender
- Electronic trading
- e-invoicing allowed · electronic ordering · electronic payment
- Review procedure
The authority will incorporate a minimum 10 calendar day standstill period at the point information on the award of the contract is communicated to tenderers.
Applicants who are unsuccessful shall be informed by the authority as soon as possible after the decision has been made as to the reasons why the Applicant was unsuccessful.
- if an appeal regarding the award of the contract has not been successfully resolved, the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No 102) provide for aggrieved parties who have been harmed or are at risk of harm by breach of the rules to take action in the High Court (England, Wales and Northern Ireland). Any such action must generally be brought within 3 months,
- if a declaration of ineffectiveness is sought, any such action must be brought within 30 days where the authority has communicated the award of the contract and a summary of reasons to tenderers, or otherwise within 6 months of the contract being entered into. Where a contract has not been entered into, the Court may order the setting aside of the award decision or order the authority to amend any document and may award damages,
- if the contract has been entered into the court may, depending on the circumstances, award damages, make a declaration of ineffectiveness, order the authority to pay a fine, and/or order that the duration of the contract is shortened.
The purpose of the standstill period referred to above is to allow the parties to apply to the Courts to set aside the award decision before the contract is entered into.
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- 20 Dec 2021, 12:00 GMT
- Submission channel
- {"electronicSubmission"}
- Accepted languages
- en
- Bid validity
- 90 days from the deadline
- Bids opened
- 20 Dec 2021, 12:30 GMT
Timeline
20 Dec 2021 → 24 Feb 2022 · 4 dates- Submission deadline20 Dec 2021, 12:00 GMT
- Bids opened20 Dec 2021, 12:30 GMT
- Contract starts1 Feb 2022
- Notice published24 Feb 2022, 13:39 GMT
Notice history
1 event · 2 releases on Find a Tender- Status changed to complete24 Feb 2022, 13:39 GMT
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast| Awarded to | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not linked to a lot1 award | |||
| Mirion Technologies (CANBERRA UK) Ltd | £460,000 † | — | Awarded |
Contracts
Contract 005153-2022-1 · Mirion Technologies (CANBERRA UK) Ltd
- Signed
- 23 Feb 2022
- Value
- £460,000
- Status
- active
Bid statistics published by the authority
| Bids | SME | VCSE | Valid bid range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5bids · 5 electronic | 3 | — | £367,000 – £543,000 |
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Dispute resolution & review bodies
- The High Court of Justice of EnglandReview body
- The University of ManchesterReview contact point
Bidders & participating suppliers
1 commercial party on the notice- Mirion Technologies (Canberra UK) LtdAwarded supplier
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Economic and financial selection criteria
- Technical selection criteria