ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH AGENCY (Defra Network eTendering Portal): Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive agencyGreater LondonLondonRan 2 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPBHC-6261-BLLQ

Open now1deadline not published
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months56+14% vs prior 12 months (49)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot1.550% single-bid · 8 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 8 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share14%of 97 awarded procedures · 110 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

97 awarded tenders, 110 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months9360 within 6 months · 49 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£38mnet · on 82 of 82 published values · top 5 = 80%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 105 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract94%(99 notices)
    99 of 105 notices are Contract (94%).
  • Framework5%(5 notices)
    5 of 105 notices are Framework (5%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(1 notices)
    1 of 105 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award74%(78 notices)
    78 of 105 notices are Direct award (74%).
  • Open12%(13 notices)
    13 of 105 notices are Open (12%).
  • Route not published12%(13 notices)
    13 of 105 notices are Route not published (12%).
  • Limited / restricted1%(1 notices)
    1 of 105 notices are Limited / restricted (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 8 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1.5robust · n=850% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 7 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

47 daysrobust · n=7
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 105 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

013 of 105 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
University of Surrey77.2%7822 Jan 2026
OptiGene Limited44.1%44—
Sakura Finetek UK Ltd33.1%33—
GTS ENTERPRISES T/A WORLDNET SHIPPING33.1%2423 Apr 2025
The Pirbright Institute22.1%2429 May 2026
The Royal Veterinary College22.1%2322 Jan 2026
University of Liverpool22.1%2322 Jan 2026
Lotek UK Limited22.1%222 Sept 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 14% of 97 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 110 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£38mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 82 of 82 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 80%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£51k middle valuerobust · n=82Middle half £23k–£141k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Appt. of a Contract Manufacturing Organisation for Production of DST-F to GMPThermo Fisher Scientific Prionic Lelystad B.V—7 yrs · up to 9 yrs£27,677,784 †
≈ £4.0m/yr
Supply of up to 30 Postmortem Room TablesPD Engineering Consultancy Ltd—5.2 yrs£750,000 †
≈ £145k/yr
Supply of One (1) MALDI-ToF Mass Spectrometer to APHABRUKER UK LIMITED1 Sept 20264.3 yrs · up to 10.3 yrs£750,000
≈ £176k/yr
Production and Supply of Poultry Rate CardsRSK ADAS Limited—2.9 yrs · up to 5.9 yrs£639,330 †
≈ £219k/yr
Supply of Specified Pathogen Free (SPF) Eggs to APHAVALO BioMedia GmbH——£479,628 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

143 of 171 contracts carry an end date, 49 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 93 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 121 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Good Practice Training2 lotsSpecialist training servicesOpen28 Sept 2026£152,500
Supply of Automatic Nucleic Acid ExtractorAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Provision of Contingency Official Veterinarians ("COV") Services in ScotlandAgricultural servicesPlanning24 Sept 2026£1,000,000
APHA CapEx: Supply of MALDI-ToF Mass Spectrometer & Servicing PlanAwarded / complete14 Sept 2026—
Cyber Vulnerability AssessmentAwarded / complete11 Sept 2026—
APHA CapEx: Supply of Spectral Flow Cytometer AnalyserAwarded / complete4 Sept 2026—
The Supply of Sterile Boot Swab Kits to the Animal and Plant Health AgencyDiagnostic kitsPlanned26 Aug 2026£166,666
Supply of Real-Time PCR Instruments to APHALaboratoryPlanned24 Aug 2026£3,800,000
Supply of a Remote Temperature Monitoring System to APHAAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026—
Provision of On-Farm Carcase Pickup Services Framework AgreementFrameworkAgricultural servicesAwarded / complete19 Aug 2026£30,000,000
C34977- Mid Throughput IDEAL™32 Extraction Robot.Awarded / complete4 Aug 2026—
Badger Hair Genotyping (APHA)Awarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
Laboratory Models with Cryopreservation StorageAwarded / complete27 Jul 2026—
APHA CapEx: Supply of Tissue SlicerAwarded / complete17 Jul 2026—
Purchase, Storage and Emergency Production of Foot and Mouth Antigen and VaccineVaccines for veterinary medicinePlanned15 Jul 2026£4,300,000
APHA CapEx: i-Qube SensorsAwarded / complete8 Jul 2026—
APHA FPAF Biosecurity Support at EventsAwarded / complete6 Jul 2026—
APHA CapEx: Supply of Bench-Top Parallel 4 Bioreactor PlatformAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
Science Estates Delivery FrameworkDPSArchitectural and related servicesPlanning3 Jul 2026£250,000,000
Technical Transfer of DST-F to CMOAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—

Search all 121 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 143 of 171 published contracts have an end date; 49 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.