ASTON UNIVERSITY: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Royal Charter CompanyDfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationWest MidlandsBirmingham

Official UK PPONPTLB-7496-TPTR

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months57+43% vs prior 12 months (40)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot40% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 119 awarded procedures · 136 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

119 awarded tenders, 136 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months164 within 6 months · 4 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£76mnet · on 38 of 38 published values · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 97 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(94 notices)
    94 of 97 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Framework3%(3 notices)
    3 of 97 notices are Framework (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award40%(39 notices)
    39 of 97 notices are Direct award (40%).
  • Limited / restricted38%(37 notices)
    37 of 97 notices are Limited / restricted (38%).
  • Route not published11%(11 notices)
    11 of 97 notices are Route not published (11%).
  • Open7%(7 notices)
    7 of 97 notices are Open (7%).
  • Selective3%(3 notices)
    3 of 97 notices are Selective (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=60% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 6 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

76 daysrobust · n=6
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 97 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 97 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

21.2% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Evolve Shopfitting Ltd43.4%44—
BMG LABTECH LIMITED32.5%33—
Waters Ltd32.5%33—
Lambda Photometrics Ltd21.7%239 Jun 2025
Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)21.7%22—
Santec Europe Ltd21.7%22—
World Precision Instruments Limited21.7%22—
Instron Division of ITW Ltd21.7%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 119 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 136 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£76mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 38 of 38 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%; a further 48 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£179k middle valuerobust · n=38Middle half £78k–£598k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
District HeatingBIRMINGHAM DISTRICT ENERGY COMPANY LIMITED—26 yrs£37,500,000
≈ £1.4m/yr
1011 - Further Competition for Audio-Visual Design, Supply, Installation and Support ServicesProAv Limited——£17,000,000 †
Phase 1B - Refurbishment Works at 10 Woodcock StreetWillmott Dixon Interiors Limited——£7,343,161 †
1051: Life Safety Systems MaintenanceMidland Fire Security Services Ltd——£2,097,459 †
Books and E BooksKortext Limited——£1,848,666 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

104 of 146 contracts carry an end date, 27 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 16 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 144 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Postgraduate Research Management SystemSoftware package and information systemsCancelled23 Oct 2026£439,000
Project Phoenix: EBRI Integrated Laboratory Safety ProgrammeElectrical installation workPlanning19 Oct 2026£791,667
Project Phoenix: EBRI Integrated Laboratory Safety ProgrammeElectrical installation workPlanning19 Oct 2026£791,667
3 Year Warranty Quotation 24606131Awarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
SEC-MALS and DSCcentral purchasing bodyLaboratoryAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Instron accessoriesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Independent Accountant's Reports (IARs) & Grant Assurance ServicesAccounting review servicesPlanning2 Sept 2026—
Plate ReaderAwarded / complete21 Aug 2026—
Energy Centre Cost ConsultantQuantity surveying servicesAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
Waste Management - Lot 2 Hazardous and Chemical Waste (Laboratory)Framework4 lotsRadioactive-Awarded / complete31 Jul 2026£1,200,000
SOFIA Curriculum Mapping PlatformAwarded / complete27 Jul 2026—
Cleaning and Janitorial ConsumablesCleaning productsAwarded / complete15 Jul 2026—
Enterprise Data Centre StorageMedia storage and reader devicesAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026—
Multi study license for CPRDAwarded / complete9 Jul 2026—
AIRDN+ Programme Evaluation and ConsultationAwarded / complete7 Jul 2026—
NGED Energy Centre ConnectionAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
Books and E Books4 lotsLibrary booksAwarded / complete24 Jun 2026—
HR and Payroll SystemSoftware supply servicesAwarded / complete23 Jun 2026—
Replacement Scientific Laser Equipment for AiPTAwarded / complete12 Jun 2026—
Condition SurveyBuilding consultancy servicesAwarded / complete4 Jun 2026—

Search all 144 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 104 of 146 published contracts have an end date; 27 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.