Birmingham City University: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationWest MidlandsBirmingham

Official UK PPONPMDM-3781-JGCD

Open now1next deadline 2 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months23+130% vs prior 12 months (10)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot4.50% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share20%of 25 awarded procedures · 23 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

25 awarded tenders, 23 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months32 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£19mnet · on 15 of 15 published values · top 5 = 84%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
University Locks Summer Clean2 Nov 20267d£416,600

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 33 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(32 notices)
    32 of 33 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Framework3%(1 notices)
    1 of 33 notices are Framework (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open39%(13 notices)
    13 of 33 notices are Open (39%).
  • Limited / restricted36%(12 notices)
    12 of 33 notices are Limited / restricted (36%).
  • Route not published12%(4 notices)
    4 of 33 notices are Route not published (12%).
  • Direct award6%(2 notices)
    2 of 33 notices are Direct award (6%).
  • Selective6%(2 notices)
    2 of 33 notices are Selective (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4.5moderate · n=40% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

91 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 33 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

06 of 33 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

10.1% above estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
OHWorks Ltd28%22—
University of Warwick28%127 Jul 2026
Softcat Plc14%11—
SKI BOUND LIMITED14%11—
Beckman Coulter United Kingdom Limited14%1113 May 2026
AMP Biomass Fuels Ltd14%11—
AMETROS FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LIMITED14%11—
Exponential-E Limited14%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 20% of 25 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 23 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£19mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 15 of 15 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 84%; a further 3 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£472k middle valuerobust · n=15Middle half £85k–£1.9m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
PS127 - Personal Assistance SchemeUniversity of Warwick7 Jul 20264 yrs£4,697,367
≈ £1.2m/yr
Occupational Health Services for University StudentsOHWorks Ltd——£4,100,000 †
IT242 - Advanced Threat ProtectionSoftcat Plc——£3,523,892 †
PS120 Occupational Health Services for StudentsOHWorks Ltd——£2,314,000 †
IT197 - Unified Communications SolutionExponential-E Limited——£1,395,607 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

9 of 22 contracts carry an end date, 3 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 65 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
ID098 - Pianos for Royal Birmingham ConservatoireAwarded / complete4 Sept 2026—
IT240 - Software Asset Management SolutionSystemAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
IT242 - Advanced Threat ProtectionSoftware-related servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
Hard Facilities Management (Hard FM) Service Provision BCU Wide.Building and facilities management servicesOpen27 Aug 2026£10,000,000
IT226 - CCTV ImprovementsClosed-circuit surveillance systemAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
IT223 - Studio ServersServersAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
IT220 - Apple and Related Goods and ServicesComputer equipment and suppliesAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
ID102 - Fire Risk AssessmentAwarded / complete29 Jul 2026—
ID097 - Overseas TripAwarded / complete29 Jul 2026—
FM307 - University Locks Summer CleanAwarded / complete29 Jul 2026—
PS129D - Digital Anatomy Visualisation TablesInstallation services of medical equipmentAwarded / complete29 Jul 2026£180,000
Flow Cytometer SystemAwarded / complete8 Jul 2026—
PS127 - Personal Assistance SchemeOther communityAwarded / complete7 Jul 2026£3,000,000
Tender for Graduation Service Venue HireEvent servicesOpen16 Jun 2026£6,000,000
Learning Analytics SolutionEducational software development servicesAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026£850,000
Hard Facilities Management (Hard FM) Service Provision BCU Wide.Building and facilities management servicesOpen28 May 2026£10,000,000
Re-Imagine Engineering Refurbishment. Millennium Point, BirminghamBuilding construction workOpen26 Mar 2026£350,000
PS129BInstallation services of medical equipmentOpen2 Mar 2026£150,000
FM288 Parkside LED Lighting Replacement4 lotsElectrical wiring and fitting workOpen16 Feb 2026£4
Computer Aided Facility Management Software (CAFM) System Service Provision.Computer-related management servicesAwarded / complete16 Jan 2026£427,000

Search all 65 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 9 of 22 published contracts have an end date; 3 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.