Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityLocal authoritySouth West EnglandBournemouth

Official UK PPONPHYY-7342-PRHH

Open now3next deadline 30 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months135+19% vs prior 12 months (113)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot228.6% single-bid · 35 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 35 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 303 awarded procedures · 773 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

303 awarded tenders, 773 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months13457 within 6 months · 62 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£183mnet · on 156 of 166 published values · 10 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 62%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

3 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
The management of Solent Meads golf course30 Oct 20265h£5,000,000
Design Lead for Christchurch Learning Centre School Satellite17 Nov 202618d£200,000
Ice Cream Products and Equipment2 lots25 Nov 202626d£3,700,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 248 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract92%(227 notices)
    227 of 248 notices are Contract (92%).
  • Framework8%(21 notices)
    21 of 248 notices are Framework (8%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open31%(77 notices)
    77 of 248 notices are Open (31%).
  • Direct award26%(65 notices)
    65 of 248 notices are Direct award (26%).
  • Route not published23%(58 notices)
    58 of 248 notices are Route not published (23%).
  • Limited / restricted19%(47 notices)
    47 of 248 notices are Limited / restricted (19%).
  • Selective0%(1 notice)
    1 of 248 notices is Selective (0%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 35 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=3528.6% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 32 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

59 daysrobust · n=32
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 248 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

069 of 248 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 18 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=18

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Community Action Network82.6%68—
Bournemouth Churches Housing Associationframework/DPS on 182.6%4915 May 2026
Go South Coast Ltd72.3%31113 Jul 2026
St Mungo Community Housing Association51.7%5516 Oct 2025
International Care Networkframework/DPS on 151.7%459 Mar 2026
Minstead Trustframework/DPS on 141.3%4415 May 2026
XMA Limited41.3%44—
CIVICA UK LIMITEDframework/DPS on 141.3%31025 Mar 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 303 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 773 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£183mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 156 of 166 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 62%; a further 35 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£126k middle valuerobust · n=156Middle half £43k–£344k; 10 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Local Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure (LEVCI) for BCP and Dorset CouncilsConnected Kerb Limited——£64,231,706 †
Strategic Implementation Partner for the Implementation of Organisational Design at BCP CouncilKPMG——£21,142,764 †
Kitchen & Bathroom RenewalsEcosafe Heating Limited T/A Ecosafe Group12 Jun 20264 yrs · up to 6 yrs£12,455,000
≈ £3.1m/yr
Windows, Doors & Sealed UnitsPARAMOUNT WINDOW & FASCIA LIMITED7 Sept 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£9,000,000
≈ £3.0m/yr
Care & Support in Extra Care HousingEleanor Nursing and Social Care Ltd—6 yrs · up to 8 yrs£6,497,479 †
≈ £1.1m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

361 of 608 contracts carry an end date, 146 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 134 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 393 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Agency Services for Disposal of Queensmead Former Care Home, 12-14 Commercial Road and Penn Hill Car ParkAwarded / complete3 Sept 2026—
Refuse Collection Vehicles (RCV's)Refuse-collection vehiclesAwarded / complete28 Aug 2026£3,060,000
West Cliff Beach - Beach-based, food-led Leisure ClubRestaurant and food-serving servicesAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026£250,000
Food Inspection ServicesFrameworkTechnical testingAwarded / complete26 Aug 2026£540,000
Chestnut Nursery (formerly Sheltered Work Opportunities) Support into EmploymentAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
Alternative Education ProvisionFramework3 lotsEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026£49,000,000
Supply of Server InfrastructureServersAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—

Search all 393 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 361 of 608 published contracts have an end date; 146 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.