Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPQNQ-2236-WRPRWebsitecnwl.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months9-25% vs prior 12 months (12)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot4.550% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share33%of 15 awarded procedures · 16 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

15 awarded tenders, 16 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months77 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£37mnet · on 9 of 9 published values · top 5 = 94%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 21 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract86%(18 notices)
    18 of 21 notices are Contract (86%).
  • Framework14%(3 notices)
    3 of 21 notices are Framework (14%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published38%(8 notices)
    8 of 21 notices are Route not published (38%).
  • Limited / restricted24%(5 notices)
    5 of 21 notices are Limited / restricted (24%).
  • Open24%(5 notices)
    5 of 21 notices are Open (24%).
  • Selective14%(3 notices)
    3 of 21 notices are Selective (14%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4.5moderate · n=450% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 21 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

05 of 21 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
LifeCome Care Limited213.3%26—
The Owl Centre Limitedframework/DPS on 2213.3%22—
ICS Operations trading as Xyla Servicesframework/DPS on 1213.3%22—
Hestia Housing and Support213.3%123 Nov 2025
Physio Med16.7%11—
Broomwell Healthwatch Limited16.7%11—
Seven Care Services Ltdframework/DPS on 116.7%11—
ICS OPERATIONS LIMITED16.7%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 33% of 15 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 16 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£37mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 9 of 9 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 94%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£3.0m middle valuerobust · n=9Middle half £500k–£8.0m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of a Stepdown Service with 24hrs Live in Support for Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustLifeCome Care Limited——£10,652,230 †
Community Based Alternative Crisis Support ServiceHestia Housing and Support3 Nov 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£8,800,000
≈ £2.9m/yr
Step-Down Bed Service Estate providerChosen Care Group Limited——£8,000,000 †
Adult ADHD Assessment and Treatment ServicesICS Operations trading as Xyla Services—1.4 yrs£3,999,999 †
≈ £2.8m/yr
Adult ADHD Assessment and Treatment ServicesICS OPERATIONS LIMITED——£2,999,999 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

12 of 24 contracts carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 34 of 34 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Provision of a Stepdown Service with 24hrs Live in Support for Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026£10,833,000
Neighbourhood Mental Health Support ServiceCommunity action programmePlanned18 Aug 2026£800,000
Complex Emotional Needs for Adults ServicesGuidance servicesPlanned11 Aug 2026£645,000
Integrated Local Offer Services to BrentCommunity action programmePlanning12 Jun 2026£0
Physiotherapy Digital TriageHealth servicesAwarded / complete24 Apr 2026—
Online Therapy Services to Secondary CareCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete27 Mar 2026—
Neurodevelopmental Disorder (ASD & ADHD) Assessments for CYPFrameworkHealth servicesAwarded / complete27 Mar 2026—
Step-Down Bed Service Estate providerCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete12 Mar 2026—
Community Based Alternative Crisis Support Service2 lotsCounselling servicesAwarded / complete12 Feb 2026£8,800,000
Neurodevelopmental Disorder (ASD & ADHD) Assessments for CYPFrameworkHealth servicesAwarded / complete5 Feb 2026—
Hillingdon Retreat Crisis HouseResidential health facilities servicesPlanning18 Dec 2025—
Adult ADHD Assessment and Treatment ServicesPsychiatrist or psychologist servicesAwarded / complete19 Nov 2025£3,500,000
Provision of Child Protection Medical and Initial Health Assessment ServiceHealth servicesPlanned6 Oct 2025£35,000
Community Based Alternative Crisis Support ServiceCounselling servicesPlanned17 Apr 2025£8,800,000
Orthotic Service for Ealing Community PartnersFrameworkHospital servicesAwarded / complete11 Apr 2025—
Adult ADHD Assessment and Treatment ServicesCommunity health servicesOpen27 Jan 2025£3,500,000
Market Engagement for Supported Living and MH Worker ServicesHospital servicesPlanned17 Jan 2025—
STEP DOWN BEDS & WORKERSHospital servicesPlanned17 Jan 2025—
STEP DOWN BEDS & WORKERSHospital servicesPlanned17 Jan 2025—
Electrocardiogram for Patients with Serious Mental Illness in the CommunityCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete6 Dec 2024—

Search all 34 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 12 of 24 published contracts have an end date; 2 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.