Crown Prosecution Service: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Non-ministerial departmentCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPYLM-7862-RZBGWebsitecps.gov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months24+4% vs prior 12 months (23)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share14%of 43 awarded procedures · 50 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

43 awarded tenders, 50 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months95 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£8.8mnet · on 28 of 28 published values · top 5 = 90%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 47 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract87%(41 notices)
    41 of 47 notices are Contract (87%).
  • Framework13%(6 notices)
    6 of 47 notices are Framework (13%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted34%(16 notices)
    16 of 47 notices are Limited / restricted (34%).
  • Direct award30%(14 notices)
    14 of 47 notices are Direct award (30%).
  • Route not published26%(12 notices)
    12 of 47 notices are Route not published (26%).
  • Selective6%(3 notices)
    3 of 47 notices are Selective (6%).
  • Open4%(2 notices)
    2 of 47 notices are Open (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 47 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 47 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Acume Forensicframework/DPS on 124.7%2317 Sept 2026
Middleton Mann24.7%22—
BECHTLE LIMITED24.7%22—
Lexis Nexis24.7%22—
VICTIM SUPPORT24.7%22—
Accenture UK Limited24.7%02—
Acumé Forensic Ltd12.3%123 Sept 2026
AVMI Kinly Ltdframework/DPS on 112.3%1217 Sept 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 14% of 43 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 50 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£8.8mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 28 of 28 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 90%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£39k middle valuerobust · n=28Middle half £20k–£85k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Financial Analytical SystemsVersion 1 Solutions Limited——£3,413,476 †
Legal Materials SubscriptionThompson Reuters——£3,102,869 †
Procurement of Legal SubscriptionsLexis Nexis——£765,773 †
Business Continuity and Disaster RecoveryMarlborough Consulting LLP14 Oct 20266 mo · up to 1 yrs£415,500
AGO Rule of Law Public PollingMore in Common——£250,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

26 of 41 contracts carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 77 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Business Continuity and Disaster RecoveryAwarded / complete23 Oct 2026—
Business Continuity and Disaster RecoveryFrameworkAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Productivity Ninja TrainingAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
Case Strategy AppSoftware development servicesPlanned14 Oct 2026£1,854,630
Electronic Presentation of Evidence - Court Equipment and Presentation Packages PR 2025 083Framework2 lotsInformation technology servicesAwarded / complete22 Sept 2026£4,833,462
Presentation Packages 2026Awarded / complete21 Sept 2026—
Leadership Development ConsultancyAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026—
Provision of Cabling and CircuitryMaintenance and repair of data network equipmentAwarded / complete17 Aug 2026£331,821
Workplace and Mediation TrainingAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—
Provision of Visual Transcription ServicesFrameworkTypingAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—
Provision of Visual Transcription ServicesFrameworkTypingAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—
Provision of Visual Transcription ServicesFrameworkTypingAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—
Victim Reference GroupAwarded / complete2 Jul 2026—
Provision of Fortigate Firewalls for CPS officesAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
Leading with ConfidenceAwarded / complete11 Jun 2026—
Python for MIS BuildAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
Oracle EPM TrainingAwarded / complete5 Jun 2026—
V C Equipment for Birmingham, Northampton and MoldAwarded / complete23 Mar 2026—
Provision of Accessibility Compliance Auditing ServicesAwarded / complete10 Mar 2026—
Disproportionality VideosAwarded / complete6 Mar 2026—

Search all 77 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 26 of 41 published contracts have an end date; 4 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.