Defence Science and Technology Laboratory: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive agencyNHS ODS: GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTCentral governmentSouth West EnglandSalisbury

Official UK PPONPDDM-1961-MTLNWebsitegov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months77+60% vs prior 12 months (48)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot250% single-bid · 10 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 138 awarded procedures · 120 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

138 awarded tenders, 120 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months207 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£18mnet · on 105 of 105 published values · top 5 = 64%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 125 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract99%(124 notices)
    124 of 125 notices are Contract (99%).
  • Framework1%(1 notice)
    1 of 125 notices is Framework (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award61%(76 notices)
    76 of 125 notices are Direct award (61%).
  • Open13%(16 notices)
    16 of 125 notices are Open (13%).
  • Route not published13%(16 notices)
    16 of 125 notices are Route not published (13%).
  • Limited / restricted10%(13 notices)
    13 of 125 notices are Limited / restricted (10%).
  • Selective3%(4 notices)
    4 of 125 notices are Selective (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=1050% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 9 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

61 daysrobust · n=9
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 126 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

015 of 126 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

8.3% above estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
S. H. L. REFRACTORIES (U.K.) LIMITED53.6%55—
Edinburgh Innovations Limited32.2%339 Jun 2025
Contained Air Solutions Ltd32.2%23—
Atlantas Marine Ltd32.2%04—
University of Portsmouth21.4%228 Aug 2025
Queen Mary University of London21.4%22—
LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company21.4%22—
University of Surrey21.4%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 138 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 120 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£18mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 105 of 105 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 64%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£22k middle valuerobust · n=105Middle half £15k–£91k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
M&E and Civil Construction Minor WorksCONCEPT BUILDING SERVICES (SOUTHERN) LTD20 Aug 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£3,000,000
≈ £1.0m/yr
M&E Minor WorksK.J. QUINN SERVICES LTD8 Oct 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£3,000,000
≈ £1.0m/yr
PA0000003042 Dstl Shuttle ServiceCOLLECTIVETECH LIMITED18 Aug 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£2,923,222
≈ £974k/yr
Equipment Cabinets and EnclosuresSteatite Limited18 Aug 20252.9 yrs£1,649,818
≈ £566k/yr
Creative Hub - Lot 1Media Zoo Limited——£1,023,009 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

106 of 137 contracts carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 20 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 162 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Dstl0000071686Awarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
DSTL0000071484Awarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
Supply of PlaneWave IRDK14 Dall-Kirkham IR telescope, DeltaRho 350 telescope plus accessories and T600 Direct Drive Gimbal Mount.Awarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
M&E Minor WorksAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
BSc (Hons) Risk and Security Management distance learning degree courseAwarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
Quantum Technology Applications & Management MScAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
MSc Data VisualizationAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026—
PhD in Molecular Cell Biology and NeurobiologyAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
IPMO 2323.03 - Signal Generators - UK 7Awarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
On-Site UKAS Sensor CalibrationiAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Controlled Key Management SystemsAwarded / complete22 Sept 2026—
UK7 - Contract DetailsAwarded / complete18 Sept 2026—
IPMO 1877.04 - Telehandler ProcurementMobile lifting framesAwarded / complete14 Sept 2026£120,000
M&E and Civil Construction Minor WorksAwarded / complete3 Sept 2026—
Technical Services Radio UpgradeRadio equipmentAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026£170,000
MSc Forensic PsychologyAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
Dstl0000068167Awarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
Dstl0000068447Awarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
Safety at Work V3Health and safety servicesOpen21 Aug 2026£810,000
Incinerator refractory repairsAwarded / complete12 Aug 2026—

Search all 162 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 106 of 137 published contracts have an end date; 4 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.