Department for Business & Trade: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: OtherNHS ODS: GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPZZJ-6312-QTTD

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months186+86% vs prior 12 months (100)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot222.2% single-bid · 9 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share5%of 282 awarded procedures · 266 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

282 awarded tenders, 266 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months9468 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£196mnet · on 244 of 247 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 286 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract99%(284 notices)
    284 of 286 notices are Contract (99%).
  • Framework1%(2 notices)
    2 of 286 notices are Framework (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award85%(242 notices)
    242 of 286 notices are Direct award (85%).
  • Selective5%(14 notices)
    14 of 286 notices are Selective (5%).
  • Route not published5%(14 notices)
    14 of 286 notices are Route not published (5%).
  • Limited / restricted3%(9 notices)
    9 of 286 notices are Limited / restricted (3%).
  • Open2%(7 notices)
    7 of 286 notices are Open (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=922.2% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

98 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 285 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

012 of 285 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Ernst and Young LLP51.8%55—
SGS United Kingdom Limitedframework/DPS on 151.8%3920 Mar 2026
Post Office Limited41.4%3513 Oct 2025
IFF Research Ltdframework/DPS on 241.4%29—
Clarion Events LIMITED31.1%33—
ADS Group31.1%33—
Moody's Analytics UK Ltd31.1%3329 Jun 2026
United Kingdom Interactive Entertainment Ltd31.1%33—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 5% of 282 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 266 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£196mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 244 of 247 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£50k middle valuerobust · n=244Middle half £25k–£90k; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Media Strategy, Planning and BuyingWavemaker Ltd5 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 4 yrs£80,000,000
≈ £27m/yr
63000000OMD Group Ltd.—4.1 yrs£63,000,000 †
≈ £15m/yr
Delivery of Strategic Business Events and TradeshowsIdentity Global Ltd4 Sept 20262 yrs · up to 3 yrs£15,000,000
≈ £7.5m/yr
Strategic Sites AcceleratorCBRE Limited14 Apr 20263 yrs£5,000,000
≈ £1.7m/yr
CAPTURE Document DisclosurePost Office Limited—4.9 yrs£4,489,365 †
≈ £913k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

323 of 341 contracts carry an end date, 8 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 8 of 94 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 328 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Benefits of Commitments on the Prohibition of Performance RequirementsAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Company Watch PlatformAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Mapping UK Professional Business Qualifications and associated Translation ServicesAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
Tumble Dryer Study to Explore Fire RisksAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
GDHA Expert Witness ReportAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
HEALTH USA 2026 UK PavilionAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
British Beauty Council activities FY 2026-27Awarded / complete19 Oct 2026—
The Economist Subscription for DBISTAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Business Support ServiceMiscellaneous business and business-related servicesPlanned15 Oct 2026£10,800,000
DBT and The British Film Commission 2026Awarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
Research into Work Stress, Burnout and Employment OutcomesDPScentral purchasing bodyResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026£1,300,000,000
Delivery of Strategic Business Events and TradeshowsAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
India visit hotel bookingAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
Rebuild Ukraine 2026 - build contractAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
OPSS renewal for Maltego MonitorAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
Executive Agency Support for SCS3 Permanent Recruitment CampaignAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
AHDB Export Development Programme 26-27Awarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
Support the development of the Ceramics Industry Support Scheme (CISS)Awarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
CR_5544 Auto Supply Chain Data for Automotive Manufacturing and Technology Plan (AMTP)Awarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
CR_5445 Consumer Survey on Secondary TicketingAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—

Search all 328 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 323 of 341 published contracts have an end date; 8 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.