Housing 21: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Registered SocietySocial housing register: Registered societyWest MidlandsBirmingham

Official UK PPONPGTG-9145-PMNM

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months124+25% vs prior 12 months (99)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot510% single-bid · 10 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 246 awarded procedures · 199 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

246 awarded tenders, 199 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2619 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£56mnet · on 193 of 193 published values · top 5 = 58%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 223 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract99%(220 notices)
    220 of 223 notices are Contract (99%).
  • Framework1%(3 notices)
    3 of 223 notices are Framework (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted78%(173 notices)
    173 of 223 notices are Limited / restricted (78%).
  • Route not published9%(21 notices)
    21 of 223 notices are Route not published (9%).
  • Open7%(15 notices)
    15 of 223 notices are Open (7%).
  • Direct award6%(13 notices)
    13 of 223 notices are Direct award (6%).
  • Selective0%(1 notices)
    1 of 223 notices are Selective (0%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5robust · n=1010% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 7 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

88 daysrobust · n=7
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 223 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

08 of 223 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

9.2% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Axis CLC Solutions Limitedframework/DPS on 193.7%9911 Feb 2026
CLC Contractors Ltd93.7%79—
Mel Green Construction Limited83.3%88—
Blocc Limited83.3%599 Jun 2026
Musson Joinery LTDframework/DPS on 172.8%7711 Feb 2026
M & J GROUP (CONSTRUCTION & ROOFING) LTD62.4%66—
Just Imagine Interiors Limited62.4%6627 Aug 2026
BELL GROUP LTDframework/DPS on 162.4%5611 Feb 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 246 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 199 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£56mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 193 of 193 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 58%; a further 10 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£75k middle valuerobust · n=193Middle half £46k–£150k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Digital Alarm Installation and Resident Communications TenderAppello Smart Living Solutions7 Aug 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£11,000,000
≈ £3.7m/yr
Catering ServicesCompass Contract Services (UK) Ltd——£9,600,000 †
Construction of affordable housingSeagate Homes (UK) Ltd—2.3 yrs£4,940,757 †
≈ £2.1m/yr
Supply of Kitchens and AccessoriesJoinery & Timber Creations (65) Limited——£4,800,000 †
Housing 21 - Responsive Repair and Maintenance WorksDynamic FM Ltd——£2,100,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

199 of 295 contracts carry an end date, 12 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 8 of 26 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 295 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Concrete paving to footpaths at Duchess Of Kent Court.Awarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Installation of Storage Heaters at Rivers CourtAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Fire Stopping Rood and Communal AreasAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Automatic Doors installation at Redmayne ViewAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Guttering works at Charles Lister CourtAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Flat Roof New decking at Knaves CourtAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Lift replacement at Irene Astor CourtAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Supply and installation of Fire ExtinguishersFire extinguishersAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026£880,000
Remodel of LHM officeAwarded / complete5 Oct 2026—
Employer Agents servicesAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Over boarding smoke shaft wallAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Cladding worksAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Ducting WorksAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Re-roofing concrete tile/artificial slateAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Installation of new storage heating and associated worksAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Walkway works at Canon Appleton CourtAwarded / complete21 Sept 2026—
Flat roofing replacementAwarded / complete18 Sept 2026—
Fascia/soffit - UPVC, Rain Water GoodsAwarded / complete18 Sept 2026—
Interior Design Services - Mini-competition - The GriffinAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
Re-roofing concrete tile/artificial slate / Fascia/soffitAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—

Search all 295 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 199 of 295 published contracts have an end date; 12 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.