LIVERPOOL HOPE UNIVERSITY: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationNorth West EnglandLIVERPOOL

Companies House03285547 ↗Websitehope.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months10-23% vs prior 12 months (13)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot50% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share20%of 15 awarded procedures · 15 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

15 awarded tenders, 15 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months22 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£3.0mnet · on 16 of 16 published values · top 5 = 73%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 23 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(23 notices)
    23 of 23 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open61%(14 notices)
    14 of 23 notices are Open (61%).
  • Direct award26%(6 notices)
    6 of 23 notices are Direct award (26%).
  • Limited / restricted4%(1 notice)
    1 of 23 notices is Limited / restricted (4%).
  • Selective4%(1 notice)
    1 of 23 notices is Selective (4%).
  • Route not published4%(1 notice)
    1 of 23 notices is Route not published (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5robust · n=60% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

56 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 23 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 23 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

8.6% above estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Enigma Industrial Services Ltd16.7%1212 Sept 2025
ARCTIC SCAFFOLDING CO. LTD16.7%1210 Jul 2025
UNIT4 Business Software Limited16.7%12—
A.A.C. WATERPROOFING LIMITED16.7%119 Sept 2026
Knowsley Lift Services Limited16.7%1127 May 2026
Flywire Payments Ltd16.7%1123 Jan 2026
Uni-Quest Ltd16.7%116 Aug 2026
Foleon B.V.16.7%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 20% of 15 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 15 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 16 of 16 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 73%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£102k middle valuerobust · n=16Middle half £62k–£138k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Student Enquiry & Management Conversion Services ProviderUni-Quest Ltd6 Aug 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£1,172,500
≈ £391k/yr
Plas Caerdeon Electrical re-wire works & fire alarm upgradeCLC Contractors Ltd12 Jun 20253 mo£428,696
Award Notice - Financial Management System Migration to Cloud SolutionUNIT4 Business Software Limited——£324,000 †
Payments Solution - SaaS ProviderFlywire Payments Ltd23 Jan 20263 yrs · up to 5.2 yrs£180,000
≈ £60k/yr
Property Damage & Business InterruptionAVIVA INSURANCE LIMITED12 Aug 20251 yrs£124,147
≈ £124k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

8 of 10 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 24 of 24 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Student Placement Management SystemAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Digital Prospectus ProviderAdvertising and marketing servicesAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026£72,000
Property Insurance ServicesFinancial and insurance servicesAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026£240,000
Payments Solution - SaaS ProviderInternational payment transfer servicesAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026£150,000
SSA & Conference - MechanicalMechanical installationsAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026£175,000
SSA & Conference - Electrical WorksElectrical installation workAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026£60,000
Eden Roof Replacement WorksRoof works and other special trade construction worksAwarded / complete9 Sept 2026£40,000
Student Enquiry & Management Conversion Services ProviderAdministrative educational servicesAwarded / complete7 Aug 2026£1,000,000
Lift Maintenance ServicesLift-maintenance servicesAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026£90,000
CAS Shield SoftwareAwarded / complete27 May 2026—
Scaffolding Purchase & Installation - 2 Islington, Liverpool.Awarded / complete4 Feb 2026—
Student Placement Management SystemAwarded / complete2 Feb 2026—
Plas Caerdeon Electrical re-wire works & fire alarm upgradeElectrical wiring and fitting workAwarded / complete28 Jan 2026£215,000
Online Programme Management (OPM) System ProviderAdult-education services at university levelPlanned18 Sept 2025—
Scaffolding Purchase & Installation - 2 Islington, Liverpool.Awarded / complete11 Sept 2025—
Property Damage & Business InterruptionAwarded / complete12 Aug 2025—
StuTalk Interconnection SoftwareAwarded / complete18 Jun 2025—
Student Enquiry and Conversion Management ServicesAdministrative educational servicesOpen18 Feb 2025—
Online Admissions SystemIndustry specific software development servicesOpen3 Feb 2025—
Award Notice - Financial Management System Migration to Cloud SolutionSoftware-related servicesAwarded / complete20 Jan 2025—

Search all 24 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 8 of 10 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.