London Borough of Enfield: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY·ONS register: Local-authority-district·Social housing register: Local authority·NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACY·Local authority·Greater London·Enfield·Ran 3 procurements for other authorities
Official UK PPONPRYN-6967-GTQPWebsiteenfield.gov.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
252 awarded tenders, 318 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
4 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extension of existing Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for the Supply of Temporary Accommodation | 23 Feb 2029 | 848d | £355,249,989 |
| Extension of existing Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for External Print Services | 23 Feb 2029 | 848d | — |
| Extension of existing Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Passenger Transport Services | 23 Feb 2029 | 848d | £60,000,000 |
| Extension of existing Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Care and Support Services for people with Learning Disabilities. | 23 Feb 2029 | 848d | — |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
85 Health and social work services16 procedures · 7%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting6 procedures · 2% · 1 open45 Construction work4 procedures · 2%51 Installation services (except software)3 procedures · 1%71 Architectural, construction, engineering3 procedures · 1%34 Transport equipment and products2 procedures · 1% · 1 open98 Other community, social and personal services2 procedures · 1% · 1 open15 Food, drink, tobacco2 procedures · 1%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 245 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract98%(240 notices)
240 of 245 notices are Contract (98%).Dynamic purchasing system1%(3 notices)
3 of 245 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).Framework1%(2 notices)
2 of 245 notices are Framework (1%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Direct award57%(139 notices)
139 of 245 notices are Direct award (57%).Limited / restricted30%(74 notices)
74 of 245 notices are Limited / restricted (30%).Route not published7%(17 notices)
17 of 245 notices are Route not published (7%).Selective3%(8 notices)
8 of 245 notices are Selective (3%).Open3%(7 notices)
7 of 245 notices are Open (3%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 245 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citisense | 12 | 4.8% | 12 | 12 | — |
| Mayer Brown | 6 | 2.4% | 6 | 6 | — |
| Fisher Cheng | 4 | 1.6% | 4 | 4 | — |
| DK-CM | 3 | 1.2% | 3 | 3 | — |
| Meinhardt UK | 3 | 1.2% | 3 | 3 | — |
| Powerday Plc | 3 | 1.2% | 3 | 3 | — |
| WSP UK Limited | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | 2 | — |
| XMA Limited | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | 2 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 252 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 318 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enfield Adult Substance Misuse Recovery Service | North London NHS Foundation Trust | — | — | £11,657,138 † |
| Manned Guarding and Vacant Property Security Services for Enfield Council | Guarding Professionals Ltd | — | — | £7,600,000 † |
| Project Agreement for Shared Investment in Building Improvement Works | Greenwich Leisure Limited | — | — | £7,500,000 † |
| Therapeutic Residential Services for Children with Complex Needs | HOLIBROOK HOUSE LIMITED | 8 Jan 2026 | 2 yrs · up to 3.3 yrs | £4,418,865 ≈ £2.2m/yr |
| Roofing and Scaffolding | Lura Constructions Ltd | 4 Jun 2026 | 2.6 yrs | £3,840,000 ≈ £1.5m/yr |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
234 of 318 contracts carry an end date, 36 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consultancy Services - Data Extraction | JustDataThings Ltd | 30 Oct 2026 | £30,000 |
| Appointment of Interim Commercial Estate & Portfolio Management Services | Spencer Craig Partnership | 30 Oct 2026 | £21,620 |
| Stock items for Windows 11 Project | CCS Media Limited | 1 Nov 2026 | £49,470 |
| Enfield Town Park Fireworks Event Management | Ragnar Security | 1 Nov 2026 | £54,000 |
| Consultancy Support for Establishment of Strategic Partnership Board Services | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | 2 Nov 2026 | £64,740 |
| Optimal Care Project 100 cases | Otesa Occupational Therapy Serv Ltd | 4 Nov 2026 | £116,000 |
| Asset Valuation Services - HRA, HGL, Investment, Surplus & OLB | Sanderson Weatherall LLP | 29 Nov 2026 | £80,060 |
| Asset Valuation Services - Investment Assets (Rural) | Knight Frank LLP | 29 Nov 2026 | £33,150 |
| Civica Cx Upgrade, Cloud Migration and Cx Mobile | Central Coast Consulting Ltd | 30 Nov 2026 | £15,600 |
| Defects Manager | Red Loft | 15 Dec 2026 | £81,848 |
Soonest 10 of 80 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 298 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 234 of 318 published contracts have an end date; 36 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.