London Borough of Enfield: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityGreater LondonEnfieldRan 3 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPRYN-6967-GTQPWebsiteenfield.gov.uk ↗

Open now4next deadline 23 Feb 2029
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months201+367% vs prior 12 months (43)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot3.533.3% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share9%of 251 awarded procedures · 317 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

251 awarded tenders, 317 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months8045 within 6 months · 13 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£65mnet · on 155 of 155 published values · top 5 = 54%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

4 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 244 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(239 notices)
    239 of 244 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(3 notices)
    3 of 244 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
  • Framework1%(2 notices)
    2 of 244 notices are Framework (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award57%(139 notices)
    139 of 244 notices are Direct award (57%).
  • Limited / restricted30%(73 notices)
    73 of 244 notices are Limited / restricted (30%).
  • Route not published7%(17 notices)
    17 of 244 notices are Route not published (7%).
  • Selective3%(8 notices)
    8 of 244 notices are Selective (3%).
  • Open3%(7 notices)
    7 of 244 notices are Open (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3.5robust · n=633.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

83 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 244 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 244 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

8.9% above estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Citisense124.8%1212—
Mayer Brown62.4%66—
Fisher Cheng41.6%44—
DK-CM31.2%33—
Meinhardt UK31.2%33—
Powerday Plc31.2%33—
WSP UK Limited20.8%22—
XMA Limited20.8%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 251 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 317 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£65mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 155 of 155 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 54%; a further 61 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£49k middle valuerobust · n=155Middle half £16k–£120k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Enfield Adult Substance Misuse Recovery ServiceNorth London NHS Foundation Trust——£11,657,138 †
Manned Guarding and Vacant Property Security Services for Enfield CouncilGuarding Professionals Ltd——£7,600,000 †
Project Agreement for Shared Investment in Building Improvement WorksGreenwich Leisure Limited——£7,500,000 †
Therapeutic Residential Services for Children with Complex NeedsHOLIBROOK HOUSE LIMITED8 Jan 20262 yrs · up to 3.3 yrs£4,418,865
≈ £2.2m/yr
Roofing and ScaffoldingLura Constructions Ltd4 Jun 20262.6 yrs£3,840,000
≈ £1.5m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

234 of 317 contracts carry an end date, 36 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 80 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 297 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Ground investigation Brimsdown Sports ground and Montague Industrial EstateAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Transport Consultancy for ENTAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Enfield Town Park Fireworks Event ManagementAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
HAF booking systemAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
Specialist Community EquipmentAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Stock Condition SurveysBuilding surveying servicesCancelled16 Oct 2026£1,125,000
The Provision of Corporate PPE and ClothingCoatsAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
Enfield Council Cleaning and Janitorial Supplies Corporate contractAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
Polling Software Application for Enfield CouncilInformation technology servicesAwarded / complete5 Oct 2026—
Perinatal ServicesCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete5 Oct 2026—
Infant Feeding Peer Support ServiceCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Infant Parental Relationship Support ServiceHealth servicesAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Optimix Development AppraisalAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Raynham Doorstep ArtistAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Enfield Corporate Food Contract (3)FoodAwarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
Lea Valley Bridge Repairs CDM Principal Designer AppointmentAwarded / complete15 Sept 2026—
Floor Scrubber DrierAwarded / complete11 Sept 2026—
5T Mechanical Sweeper RentalAwarded / complete11 Sept 2026—
Reablement Care ServiceHealth and social work servicesPlanning9 Sept 2026£2,850,000
Defects ManagerAwarded / complete8 Sept 2026—

Search all 297 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 234 of 317 published contracts have an end date; 36 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.