London Borough of Hammersmith and Fuham (LBHF): Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Local authorityGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPHTW-6333-BQGD

Open now1next deadline 4 Nov 2027
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months720% vs prior 12 months (72)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot2.541.7% single-bid · 12 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 12 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share7%of 109 awarded procedures · 146 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

109 awarded tenders, 146 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3715 within 6 months · 7 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£60mnet · on 36 of 36 published values · top 5 = 93%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Environmental Enforcement Agency4 Nov 2027364d£2,653,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 144 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(138 notices)
    138 of 144 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework4%(6 notices)
    6 of 144 notices are Framework (4%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published33%(48 notices)
    48 of 144 notices are Route not published (33%).
  • Limited / restricted28%(40 notices)
    40 of 144 notices are Limited / restricted (28%).
  • Open21%(30 notices)
    30 of 144 notices are Open (21%).
  • Direct award16%(23 notices)
    23 of 144 notices are Direct award (16%).
  • Selective2%(3 notices)
    3 of 144 notices are Selective (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 12 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2.5robust · n=1241.7% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 11 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

58 daysrobust · n=11
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 121 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

022 of 121 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 6 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.7% above estimaterobust · n=6

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
A N Contract Services Ltd32.8%13—
Cuttle Construction Limited32.8%03—
Standing Together Against Domestic Abuse21.8%2327 Mar 2026
National Energy Foundation21.8%2211 Dec 2025
Sutcliffe Play21.8%22—
Hubbub Foundation UK21.8%22—
Let Me Play21.8%2213 Jan 2026
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust21.8%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 7% of 109 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 146 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£60mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 36 of 36 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 93%; a further 45 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£80k middle valuerobust · n=36Middle half £50k–£213k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Genito-Urinary Medicine (GUM) & Sexual Reproductive Health (SRH) ServicesChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust——£30,974,246 †
Health Visiting Services for H&F 0–19(25) London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham CouncilCentral London Community Healthcare NHS Trust——£19,289,837 †
Provision of care and support services for residents with learning disabilities at Emlyn Gardens supported living schemeLEARNING DISABILITY NETWORK LONDON LTD——£3,678,000 †
Hammersmith and Fulham Advocacy Services for AdultsLibra Partnership—3.9 yrs · up to 5.9 yrs£1,446,720 †
≈ £369k/yr
Self-Directed Support Service for Hammersmith & FulhamAction on Disability1 May 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£847,770
≈ £283k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

76 of 115 contracts carry an end date, 15 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 37 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 121 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Community Reablement & Home Care Services for Adults in Hammersmith & FulhamFramework2 lotsRehabilitation servicesAwarded / complete15 Jun 2026£120,000,000
Hammersmith and Fulham Advocacy Services for AdultsGuidance and counselling servicesAwarded / complete12 Jun 2026£1,507,000
LBHF Children Looked After CAMHS 2026Psychiatrist or psychologist servicesAwarded / complete12 Jun 2026—
Event Management Services Hammersmith Traffic Free Festivals (2026–27)Awarded / complete11 Jun 2026—
Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) Services3 lotsSocial work services without accommodationAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026£4,847,000
School Nursing for Children and Young People Aged 5–19 (up to 25 for SEND)Community health servicesOpen27 May 2026£8,820,000
Housing Repairs 20274 lotsConstruction workOpen21 May 2026£118,500,000
LBHF SEND IASS - Contract Award NoticeHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete14 May 2026£490,000
LBHF SEND Mediation and Disagreement Resolution Service - Contract Details NoticeHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete14 May 2026£210,000

Search all 121 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 76 of 115 published contracts have an end date; 15 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.