Midland Heart: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Registered SocietySocial housing register: Registered societyWest MidlandsBirmingham

Official UK PPONPPMZ-2234-VXBJ

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months53+89% vs prior 12 months (28)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot541.9% single-bid · 31 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 31 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 83 awarded procedures · 116 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

83 awarded tenders, 116 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2412 within 6 months · 4 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£121mnet · on 60 of 85 published values · 25 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 69%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 81 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(79 notices)
    79 of 81 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(2 notices)
    2 of 81 notices are Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published33%(27 notices)
    27 of 81 notices are Route not published (33%).
  • Limited / restricted26%(21 notices)
    21 of 81 notices are Limited / restricted (26%).
  • Direct award15%(12 notices)
    12 of 81 notices are Direct award (15%).
  • Open14%(11 notices)
    11 of 81 notices are Open (14%).
  • Selective12%(10 notices)
    10 of 81 notices are Selective (12%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 31 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5robust · n=3141.9% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 11 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

91 daysrobust · n=11
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 81 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

017 of 81 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Pinnacle FM Ltd33.6%1316 Oct 2025
RIDGE AND PARTNERS LLP22.4%23—
Marlborough Consulting LLP22.4%2222 Apr 2026
MILLER HOMES LIMITED22.4%2222 Sept 2026
Chequers Contract Services Limited22.4%2226 Nov 2025
Arco Limited22.4%2231 Mar 2026
GMS Services Limitedframework/DPS on 122.4%03—
Integrated Water Services Ltdframework/DPS on 122.4%03—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 83 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 116 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£121mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 60 of 85 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 69%; a further 4 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£149k middle valuerobust · n=60Middle half £50k–£925k; 25 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Land Purchase and WorksMILLER HOMES LIMITED22 Sept 20264.9 yrs · up to 5.9 yrs£26,329,509
≈ £5.4m/yr
Sale Agreement and Boleyn RoadWB Property Group Limited—2 yrs · up to 3 yrs£18,679,000
≈ £9.3m/yr
Grounds Maintenance 0001Chequers Contract Services Limited26 Nov 20255 yrs · up to 10 yrs£13,371,371
≈ £2.7m/yr
Development and Sale AgreementMILLER HOMES LIMITED—2.9 yrs · up to 4 yrs£13,077,908
≈ £4.5m/yr
Development AgreementBESPOKE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LIMITED28 Aug 20261.1 yrs · up to 2.1 yrs£11,344,000
≈ £10m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

95 of 126 contracts carry an end date, 37 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 24 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 125 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Onboard Board Intelligence PlatformAwarded / complete19 Oct 2026—
MH370 - Employee Benefits PortalIndustry specific software packageAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026£400,000
New Build DevelopmentAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
ConsultancyAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Consultancy ServicesAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
Development AgreementAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
Recruitment ServicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
Job and Mobile Workforce Management SolutionSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
Communal Spaces Site SurveysGrounds maintenance servicesPlanning25 Aug 2026£50,000
Surveying & Associated Services - Lot 1 EPC Surveys2 lotsBuilding surveying servicesAwarded / complete21 Aug 2026£2,416,667
Body Worn CamerasSecurity camerasAwarded / complete18 Aug 2026—
Lot 1 - PPE/WorkwearCleaning productsAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026£620,000
Insurance workAwarded / complete4 Aug 2026—
Electronic Payment SystemBanking servicesOpen30 Jul 2026£1,000,000
RecruitmentAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
Housing Service Charge and Rent Setting SystemIndustry specific software packageOpen27 Jul 2026£1,458,333
Temporary CCTVAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—
Job Posting & Advertisement - LinkedInAwarded / complete20 Jul 2026—
Development AgreementAwarded / complete2 Jul 2026—
Lot 2 & Lot 3 - Cleaning Products & StationeryCleaning productsAwarded / complete23 Jun 2026£620,000

Search all 125 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 95 of 126 published contracts have an end date; 37 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.