Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Ministerial departmentGOV.UK register: OtherCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon United KingdomRan 2 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPWCX-8281-CLPR

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months22+5% vs prior 12 months (21)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot166.7% single-bid · 12 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 12 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share18%of 56 awarded procedures · 49 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

56 awarded tenders, 49 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months149 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£81mnet · on 35 of 38 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 92%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 43 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(42 notices)
    42 of 43 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(1 notice)
    1 of 43 notices is Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award40%(17 notices)
    17 of 43 notices are Direct award (40%).
  • Open23%(10 notices)
    10 of 43 notices are Open (23%).
  • Route not published23%(10 notices)
    10 of 43 notices are Route not published (23%).
  • Limited / restricted14%(6 notices)
    6 of 43 notices are Limited / restricted (14%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 12 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1robust · n=1266.7% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

27 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 43 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

014 of 43 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 9 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=9

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Locality (UK)58.9%17—
Financial Times Ltd35.4%33—
Capita Property & Infrastructure Ltd23.6%2528 Jul 2026
NLA Media Access Limited23.6%22—
THE CENTRAL BRITISH FUND FOR WORLD JEWISH RELIEF23.6%1418 Jul 2025
Deconstruct UK Ltd23.6%13—
Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Limited23.6%12—
CIPFA Business Limited23.6%1222 Oct 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 18% of 56 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 49 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£81mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 35 of 38 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 92%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£55k middle valuerobust · n=35Middle half £23k–£226k; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Neighbourhood Planning Support ServicesLocality (UK)——£45,786,877 †
Grenfell Tower Principal ContractorDeconstruct UK Ltd——£12,250,000 †
Green Flag Award SchemeKeep Britain Tidy——£7,378,078 †
Voter ID CardsHH Associates Limited——£5,000,000 †
External Assurance Reviews of Local AuthoritiesCIPFA Business Limited22 Oct 20251 yrs · up to 3 yrs£4,500,000
≈ £4.5m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

48 of 61 contracts carry an end date, 16 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 14 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 88 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Client Side Support Provider (CSSP)Architectural and related servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
English Language and Employment Support for Ukrainian and Hong Kong BN(O)sTraining servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026£12,480,000
External Assurance Reviews of Local AuthoritiesFinancial consultancy servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026£4,500,000
Voter ID CardsPrinting and related servicesAwarded / complete28 Sept 2026—
English Indices of Deprivation - 2028 Refresh, Methods Review & Data FeasibilityResearch servicesWithdrawn22 Sept 2026£3,000,000
Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF) Assurance for Local Authorities (Interim)FrameworkAwarded / complete4 Sept 2026—
Network for NeighbourhoodsArchitecturalOpen26 Aug 2026£18,030,000
Lancaster West Estate Refurbishment Programme Delivery ReviewAwarded / complete21 Aug 2026—
MHCLG Augmented Planning Decisionsprocuring entityIT services: consultingAwarded / complete6 Aug 2026£8,333,333
MHCLG Standby Communications ResearchResearch servicesWithdrawn31 Jul 2026£10,000,000
Aggregate Working Parties Secretariat Lot 5Awarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
Independent Evaluation of City Deal, Growth Deal and Devolution DealsBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete15 Jul 2026£1,950,000
Aggregate Working Parties Secretariat9 lotsEnvironmental servicesAwarded / complete15 Jul 2026£606,664
Provision of Planning Pipeline DataResearch servicesPlanning10 Jun 2026£650,000
Market Warming Event for Research and Evaluation Contracts for MHCLGResearch consultancy servicesPlanned27 May 2026£19,000,000
Ombudsman - New HomesAdministrative services for business operationsPlanned22 May 2026£12,000,000
Custodial Tenancy Deposit Protection SchemeFinancial and insurance servicesPlanned21 May 2026£1,400,000,000
Technical Advice for Planning DecisionsTechnical servicesOpen14 May 2026£7,500,000
MHCLG NLA LicenceAwarded / complete16 Apr 2026—
MHCLG Financial Times SubscriptionAwarded / complete4 Mar 2026—

Search all 88 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 48 of 61 published contracts have an end date; 16 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.