NATIONAL NUCLEAR LABORATORY LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGOV.UK register: Public corporationNorth West EnglandWarrington

Official UK PPONPVXT-8784-YGNV

Open now1next deadline 8 Jan 2029
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months54+23% vs prior 12 months (44)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 80 awarded procedures · 116 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

80 awarded tenders, 116 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3010 within 6 months · 11 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£7.5mnet · on 50 of 50 published values · top 5 = 46%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Operations, Site Work and Facilities Management Dynamic Purchasing SystemDPScentral purchasing body8 lots8 Jan 2029804d£15,000,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 98 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract89%(87 notices)
    87 of 98 notices are Contract (89%).
  • Framework11%(11 notices)
    11 of 98 notices are Framework (11%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published36%(35 notices)
    35 of 98 notices are Route not published (36%).
  • Direct award35%(34 notices)
    34 of 98 notices are Direct award (35%).
  • Limited / restricted15%(15 notices)
    15 of 98 notices are Limited / restricted (15%).
  • Open11%(11 notices)
    11 of 98 notices are Open (11%).
  • Selective3%(3 notices)
    3 of 98 notices are Selective (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1indicative · n=1100% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

41 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 98 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 98 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
NORTH WEST PROJECTS LIMITED (trading as ACTEMIUM DESIGN UK)framework/DPS on 133.8%351 Jul 2026
Stantec UK Limitedframework/DPS on 122.5%2729 Jul 2026
Nuvia Limitedframework/DPS on 122.5%2729 Jul 2026
Crimson Industrial Vision Ltd22.5%22—
GROUNDH2O PLUS LIMITED22.5%22—
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS LTD22.5%22—
Tannahill Reay Visual Communications Limited22.5%22—
Eden Nuclear and Environment Ltd22.5%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 80 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 116 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£7.5mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 50 of 50 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 46%; a further 6 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£78k middle valuerobust · n=50Middle half £46k–£168k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
PROCESS MODELLING SOFTWARESiemens Industry Software Limited6 May 20255 yrs£975,036
≈ £195k/yr
Preliminary Design Call-off ContractNORTH WEST PROJECTS LIMITED (trading as ACTEMIUM DESIGN UK)1 Jul 20266 mo · up to 0.6 yrs£887,764
Journal AccessElsevier B.V.29 Jul 20265 yrs · up to 6 yrs£646,891
≈ £129k/yr
Provision of ANSWERS/FISPIN Nuclear Software CodesEnergy, Safety and Risk Consultants (UK) Limited—3 yrs£603,312
≈ £201k/yr
Integrated Intelligent Safe Environment Phase 2University of Birmingham——£300,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

74 of 97 contracts carry an end date, 16 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 30 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 149 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Procurement of endoscope for FHP inspectionsChecking and testing apparatusAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
Supply of Aerosol SpectrometerAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
Split Butterfly Valve for Powder Transfer ApplicationsValves defined by constructionPlanning9 Oct 2026—
Supply of Equipment for HALEU Deconversion Experimental ProgrammeAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
NIRAB ChairAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Muon Technical De-risking ProgrammeAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Consolidated Equipment Services/ Repair ContractsInstallation services of laboratory equipmentPlanning17 Sept 2026—
Advisory and Consultancy Services to support WIT 2 Coding.Awarded / complete7 Sept 2026—
Institute for Customer Service MembershipAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
Preliminary Design Call-off ContractAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026—
Strategic Design Partner to Support Deconversion - Framework AgreementFrameworkEngineering design servicesAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026£3,500,000
Provision of ANSWERS/FISPIN Nuclear Software CodesAwarded / complete19 Aug 2026—
Open Framework for Nuclear Technical ServicesFramework10 lotsEngineering-related scientific and technical servicesAwarded / complete18 Aug 2026£10,000,000
ATROPOS projectMachinery for the production and use of mechanical powerPlanning4 Aug 2026—
UKNNL Strategic PlanAwarded / complete3 Aug 2026—
Scientific Journal AccessAwarded / complete29 Jul 2026—
Supply of Hoppers, Screwfeeders, Vibratory Feeders and Rotary BarrelsEngineering servicesPlanning29 Jul 2026£150,000
Managed Security Operations Centre (SOC) and Incident Response Services AgreementIT services: consultingOpen23 Jul 2026£2,500,000
VP Chemical Testing Phase IIIAwarded / complete21 Jul 2026—
NNLC746 - Nuclear Advanced Computing & Innovation Partnership (NACIP)Information technology servicesPlanning2 Jul 2026£500,000

Search all 149 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 74 of 97 published contracts have an end date; 16 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.