North Lanarkshire Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

ONS register: Local-authority-districtLocal authorityScotlandMotherwellCentral purchasing body on 11 of 46 notices

Find a Tender organisation id689Websitenorthlanarkshire.gov.uk ↗

Open now3next deadline 30 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months230% vs prior 12 months (23)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot312% single-bid · 25 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 25 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share10%of 135 awarded procedures · 468 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

135 awarded tenders, 468 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2712 within 6 months · 26 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£89mnet · on 27 of 27 published values · top 5 = 77%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

3 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 46 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract67%(31 notices)
    31 of 46 notices are Contract (67%).
  • Framework33%(15 notices)
    15 of 46 notices are Framework (33%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open83%(38 notices)
    38 of 46 notices are Open (83%).
  • Route not published11%(5 notices)
    5 of 46 notices are Route not published (11%).
  • Selective4%(2 notices)
    2 of 46 notices are Selective (4%).
  • Limited / restricted2%(1 notice)
    1 of 46 notices is Limited / restricted (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 25 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=2512% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 46 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

134 of 46 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Saltire Facilities Management Ltd53.7%25—
Getting Better Together Ltdframework/DPS on 453.7%16—
Caledonian Maintenance Services Ltdframework/DPS on 143%24—
ENABLE Scotlandframework/DPS on 443%04—
The Verdancy Group Ltdframework/DPS on 332.2%14—
ACTION FOR CHILDRENframework/DPS on 232.2%13—
GMG Contractors Ltd32.2%13—
Simon Community Scotland32.2%13—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 10% of 135 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 468 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£89mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 27 of 27 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 77%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£980k middle valuerobust · n=27Middle half £234k–£2.5m.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

160 of 255 contracts carry an end date, 154 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 27 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 178 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
MTC for Window & Doors Replacement 2025 – 2027 (HO WN 24 027 )2 lotsInstallation of doorsAwarded / complete5 Sept 2025£4,500,000
Appointment of Lift Consultant for Lift Replacement Works - Phase 4 & 5Civil engineering consultancy servicesAwarded / complete5 Sept 2025£250,000
Befriending Service for Children and Young PeopleCommunity action programmeAwarded / complete4 Sept 2025—
Management Services for The Centre CumbernauldCommercial property management servicesAwarded / complete4 Sept 2025£5,522,000
Flexible Framework for Services linked to Scottish Attainment Challenge (SAC) and Pupil Equity Fund (PEF) - Entry Point 4Framework10 lotsEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete29 Aug 2025£16,000,000
MTC for Solar PV and Renewable Technologies(HO EE 24 034)2 lotsConstruction work for housesAwarded / complete14 Aug 2025£50,000,000
MTC for Re-Roofing, Re-Rendering & Energy Efficiency Works including EES:ABS HO RF 23 0523 lotsBuilding alteration workAwarded / complete14 Aug 2025£99,000,000

Search all 178 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 160 of 255 published contracts have an end date; 154 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.