Office for Students: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCentral governmentSouth West EnglandBristol

Official UK PPONPYZM-6681-RPZP

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months11-31% vs prior 12 months (16)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot120% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share19%of 43 awarded procedures · 58 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

43 awarded tenders, 58 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months138 within 6 months · 6 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£5.1mnet · on 19 of 19 published values · top 5 = 81%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 27 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract93%(25 notices)
    25 of 27 notices are Contract (93%).
  • Framework7%(2 notices)
    2 of 27 notices are Framework (7%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open56%(15 notices)
    15 of 27 notices are Open (56%).
  • Direct award30%(8 notices)
    8 of 27 notices are Direct award (30%).
  • Route not published11%(3 notices)
    3 of 27 notices are Route not published (11%).
  • Limited / restricted4%(1 notice)
    1 of 27 notices is Limited / restricted (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

12robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

34 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 27 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

114 of 27 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

1.5% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
KPMGframework/DPS on 137%2320 Jul 2026
Ecorys UK Limited37%2324 Feb 2026
Public First Limitedframework/DPS on 124.7%22—
Advance HEframework/DPS on 124.7%22—
Shift Insight Ltdframework/DPS on 124.7%13—
Centre for Transforming Access and Student Outcomes24.7%12—
IPSOS (MARKET RESEARCH) LTD24.7%02—
IFF Research Ltdframework/DPS on 112.3%13—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 19% of 43 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 58 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£5.1mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 19 of 19 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 81%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£53k middle valuerobust · n=19Middle half £29k–£288k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of support services for TRAC and understanding academic and financial sustainability of the UK higher education sectorKPMG20 Jul 20262 yrs · up to 4 yrs£2,083,333
≈ £1.0m/yr
AI Project Delivery & DevelopmentUNIFEYE LTD11 Feb 20261 yrs · up to 2 yrs£657,000
≈ £657k/yr
Office for Students: Provision of Support Services for TRACKPMG11 Aug 20251 yrs£530,000
≈ £530k/yr
Contract for services to evaluate the Office for Students regulation of qualityEcorys UK Limited21 Aug 20256 yrs · up to 8 yrs£500,000
≈ £83k/yr
Contract for Impact Evaluation of the OfS APP approachEcorys UK Limited24 Feb 20261.5 yrs · up to 4.8 yrs£334,588
≈ £223k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

42 of 50 contracts carry an end date, 17 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 9 of 13 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 49 of 49 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Consultation analysisMarket and economic research; polling and statisticsAwarded / complete28 Oct 2022£450,000
Office for Students - Contract for Learning in relation to Regulatory Theory and its applicationSpecialist training servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2022£150,000
Office for Students - Contract for Student mental health 'what works' projectEvaluation consultancy servicesAwarded / complete13 Jun 2022£300,000
Contract for an employer broker service for the Office for Students Postgraduate Conversion Course ProgrammeBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete19 May 2022£108,333
Managed Cyber Security Service for the Office for StudentsIT services: consultingAwarded / complete25 Mar 2022£320,000
Office for Students - Hard Facilities Management ServicesBuilding and facilities management servicesAwarded / complete9 Mar 2022£1,000,000
Hosting and Maintenance of Office for Students WebsiteIT services: consultingAwarded / complete12 Aug 2021£296,000
Workday Support ServicesSoftware programming and consultancy servicesAwarded / complete8 Jul 2021£250,000
Evaluation of the joint RE and OfS funding competition to improve access and participation for Black, Asian and minority ethnic students in postgraduate research studyEvaluation consultancy servicesAwarded / complete28 May 2021—

Search all 49 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 42 of 50 published contracts have an end date; 17 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.