Office of Rail and Road: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
GOV.UK register: Non-ministerial department·Central government·Greater London·London
Official UK PPONPMPH-6471-MDYY
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
46 awarded tenders, 38 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic analysis of access applications | 4 Nov 2026 | 6d | £95,000 |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting26 procedures · 40%71 Architectural, construction, engineering9 procedures · 14%73 Research and development services6 procedures · 9% · 1 open72 IT services: consulting, software, internet5 procedures · 8%66 Financial and insurance services3 procedures · 5%50 Repair and maintenance services1 procedure · 2%60 Transport services (except waste transport)1 procedure · 2%80 Education and training services1 procedure · 2%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 65 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract95%(62 notices)
62 of 65 notices are Contract (95%).Framework5%(3 notices)
3 of 65 notices are Framework (5%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open74%(48 notices)
48 of 65 notices are Open (74%).Route not published20%(13 notices)
13 of 65 notices are Route not published (20%).Direct award5%(3 notices)
3 of 65 notices are Direct award (5%).Limited / restricted2%(1 notice)
1 of 65 notices is Limited / restricted (2%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 65 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH LIMITED | 4 | 8.7% | 3 | 4 | — |
| CEPA LLP | 3 | 6.5% | 2 | 3 | — |
| REBEL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS & OPERATIONS UK LTD | 2 | 4.3% | 2 | 2 | — |
| CPCS Transcom UK Ltd | 2 | 4.3% | 2 | 2 | — |
| SYSTRA Limited | 2 | 4.3% | 2 | 2 | — |
| FURRER + FREY GB LIMITED | 2 | 4.3% | 2 | 2 | — |
| HAYS SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LIMITED | 1 | 2.2% | 1 | 1 | — |
| AECOM LIMITED | 1 | 2.2% | 1 | 1 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 17% of 46 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 38 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measuring Whole industry total factor productivity (TFP) of the railway in Great Britain | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH LIMITED | — | 4 mo | £7,968,125 † |
| CP7 Recalibration of the Network Rail Passenger Schedule 8 Regime | Steer Davies & Gleave Ltd | — | — | £205,704 † |
| Oracle Managed Support Service | Version 1 Solutions Limited | — | 3 yrs · up to 5 yrs | £201,000 † ≈ £67k/yr |
| Whole System Monitoring & Rail Reform Strategic Support | CPCS Transcom UK Ltd | — | 3 mo · up to 0.5 yrs | £177,898 † |
| IT Help Desk Outsourcing | Stone Technologies Ltd t/a Converge Technology Solutions | — | 1 yrs · up to 4 yrs | £145,385 † ≈ £145k/yr |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
44 of 46 contracts carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A review of National Highways' culture, approach, and processes to promote, incentivise and embed innovation | AECOM LIMITED | 31 Jan 2027 | £72,942 |
| CEO Partner Recruitment | Saxton Bampfylde Hever Ltd | 16 Mar 2027 | £35,000 |
| Mnaufacture and Provision of Train Driving Licences | Euclid Limited | 29 Apr 2027 | £55,000 |
| Network Related Services | Exponential-E Limited | 29 Apr 2027 | £47,310 |
| Power Platform Application Support and Development | CLOUDSOURCE LTD | 31 Aug 2027 | £144,000 |
Soonest 5 of 6 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 69 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best Practice Review of On-Track Machine and Plant Strategies Across European Railway'sResearch consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 18 Sept 2025 | £60,000 |
| Facilitated workshops to improve the efficiency of regulatory engagement with Network RailBusiness and management consultancy and related services | Awarded / complete | 11 Sept 2025 | £75,000 |
| Measuring Whole industry total factor productivity (TFP) of the railway in Great BritainBusiness and management consultancy and related services | Awarded / complete | 10 Sept 2025 | £80,000 |
| Review of Approach to Inflation and Input Prices taken by Network RailFinancial consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 2 Sept 2025 | £80,000 |
| External Board Effectiveness Review 2025/26Business and management consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 20 Aug 2025 | £30,000 |
| Data & Risk Planning Analyst - Temp | Awarded / complete | 14 Aug 2025 | — |
| 25 x Lenovo X13 Yoga Gen 5 Laptops | Awarded / complete | 14 Aug 2025 | — |
| Investment FrameworkResearch and development services and related consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 7 Aug 2025 | £50,000 |
| Recruitment HM Inspector of Railways | Awarded / complete | 7 Aug 2025 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 44 of 46 published contracts have an end date; 2 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.