Oxfordshire County Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: County-or-unitary-authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandOxford

Official UK PPONPZNW-8281-MHNMWebsiteoxfordshire.gov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months144+85% vs prior 12 months (78)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot517.6% single-bid · 17 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 17 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share10%of 227 awarded procedures · 353 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

227 awarded tenders, 353 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months6740 within 6 months · 11 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£116mnet · on 142 of 142 published values · top 5 = 75%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 222 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract95%(210 notices)
    210 of 222 notices are Contract (95%).
  • Framework5%(12 notices)
    12 of 222 notices are Framework (5%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted44%(97 notices)
    97 of 222 notices are Limited / restricted (44%).
  • Route not published21%(46 notices)
    46 of 222 notices are Route not published (21%).
  • Open18%(41 notices)
    41 of 222 notices are Open (18%).
  • Direct award14%(31 notices)
    31 of 222 notices are Direct award (14%).
  • Selective3%(7 notices)
    7 of 222 notices are Selective (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 17 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5robust · n=1717.6% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 17 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

101 daysrobust · n=17
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 222 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

029 of 222 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 8 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.1% below estimaterobust · n=8

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 10% of 227 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 353 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£116mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 142 of 142 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 75%; a further 9 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£100k middle valuerobust · n=142Middle half £56k–£211k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Integrated Community EquipmentMILLBROOK HEALTHCARE LTD (00833987)31 Jul 20252.9 yrs£45,000,000
≈ £15m/yr
Overnight Residential Short Breaks for Disabled ChildrenACTION FOR CHILDREN——£11,900,000 †
Carers Support ServiceAction for Carers Oxfordshire11 Mar 202610 yrs£10,707,122
≈ £1.1m/yr
Adult Short Break ServiceHIGHER HEIGHT CARE LTD—6 yrs · up to 8.3 yrs£9,591,040
≈ £1.6m/yr
Dementia Support ServiceAGE UK OXFORDSHIRE24 Dec 20255 yrs · up to 10 yrs£9,135,100
≈ £1.8m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

195 of 314 contracts carry an end date, 57 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 8 of 67 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 344 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Your notice has been published on the Find a Tender service. THAMES VALLEY FIRE CONTROL SERVICE COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMIT services: consultingAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026£11,000,000
Food and Green Waste TreatmentNon-hazardous refuse and waste treatment and disposal servicesPlanning22 Oct 2026£38,000,000
Fire Remedial Works - Carterton Community CollegeAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Mental Health Training ServicesAdult and other education servicesAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026£1,225,000
Boiler and Pipework Replacement WorksAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
Water Pipework Replacement at Fringford SchoolAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
Water Rescue Training with Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue - HR WallingfordAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
Installation of new windows and doors at Thame fire stationAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
Witney Resource Centre Grid UpgradeAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
Five Acres Roofing Repairs (Phase 2)Roof works and other special trade construction worksAwarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
Installation of new windows and doors at Blackbird Leys LibraryAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
Oxfordshire Fire & Rescue Service, Fire Station Broadway, DidcotAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
Food and Green Waste TreatmentNon-hazardous refuse and waste treatment and disposal servicesPlanning6 Oct 2026—
Refurbishment of WC at Thornhill P&RAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
I-4988 - Extra Care Housing 6 SchemesHealth servicesPlanned30 Sept 2026—
Provision of Depolluted Vehicles for Training PurposesSecurityAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026£336,000
Berinsfield to Oxford and Wheatley to Oxford Cycle RoutesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Installation of new windows and doors at Bicester fire stationAwarded / complete21 Sept 2026—
Toilet Refurbishment at Tetsworth SchoolAwarded / complete21 Sept 2026—
Contract for the Provision of Closed Landfill Management, Monitoring and MaintenanceLandfill management servicesPlanning21 Sept 2026£750,000

Search all 344 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 195 of 314 published contracts have an end date; 57 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.