Rossendale Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityNorth West EnglandBacup

Official UK PPONPTNM-4478-CMGTWebsiterossendale.gov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months12+9% vs prior 12 months (11)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot5.512.5% single-bid · 8 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 8 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share28%of 18 awarded procedures · 16 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

18 awarded tenders, 16 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months42 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£7.4mnet · on 15 of 15 published values · top 5 = 87%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 23 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract91%(21 notices)
    21 of 23 notices are Contract (91%).
  • Framework9%(2 notices)
    2 of 23 notices are Framework (9%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open65%(15 notices)
    15 of 23 notices are Open (65%).
  • Limited / restricted26%(6 notices)
    6 of 23 notices are Limited / restricted (26%).
  • Direct award9%(2 notices)
    2 of 23 notices are Direct award (9%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 8 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5.5robust · n=812.5% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 11 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

28 daysrobust · n=11
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 23 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

114 of 23 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 8 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=8

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
EVERFLOW LIMITED211.1%2221 Jan 2026
Geoffrey Robinson Limited211.1%2213 Apr 2026
Burnley Pendle and Rossendale Council for Voluntary Service15.6%1119 Jun 2026
THE WHITAKER ORGANISATION15.6%118 Jun 2026
ROSSENDALE REFUGEE SUPPORT GROUP15.6%1117 Jul 2026
Crown Gas & Power15.6%118 Oct 2025
P Casey & Co. Limited15.6%1129 Oct 2025
RLX Construction15.6%1126 Sept 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 28% of 18 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 16 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£7.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 15 of 15 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 87%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£120k middle valuerobust · n=15Middle half £68k–£374k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
RAWTENSTALL MARKET REFURBISHMENTP Casey & Co. Limited29 Oct 20251 yrs£3,982,058
≈ £4.0m/yr
Delivery of Decarbonisation Works at Marl Pits Leisure Centre, RawtenstallGeoffrey Robinson Limited13 Apr 20269 mo£1,265,397
Rawtenstall Temporary Market - ConstructionRLX Construction26 Sept 20253 mo£490,669
Electricity Supply Contract - Rossendale Borough CouncilNpower Commercial Gas Limited——£447,440 †
Water and Wastewater Services for Rossendale Borough Council SitesEVERFLOW LIMITED16 Jan 20263 yrs£300,000
≈ £100k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

11 of 13 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 25 of 25 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Reactive Repairs and Small Works Framework (2026-2030)Framework15 lotsArchitecturalAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026£1,824,000
Creative Skills Programme for Young PeopleArtistic servicesAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026£89,500
Invitation to Tender for the Refurbishment of the Elder Children's Play Area at Edgeside ParkPark and playground equipmentAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026£140,000
Rossendale Resettler Support and Signposting Service (LRSSS)Social work services with accommodationAwarded / complete16 Sept 2026£120,000
Pride in Place Community Grants Programme - Service ProviderCommunity action programmeAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026£30,000
Delivery of Decarbonisation Works at Marl Pits Leisure Centre, RawtenstallDistrict-heating plant construction workAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026£1,571,922
Lead Organisation to Deliver a Creative Arts Programme in WaterfootArtistic servicesAwarded / complete8 Jun 2026£120,000
Water and Wastewater Services for Rossendale Borough Council SitesSewage servicesAwarded / complete5 Feb 2026£300,000
Soft Landscaping for Haslingden Big Lamp Public RealmConstruction workOpen4 Feb 2026£50,000
Water and Wastewater Services for Rossendale Borough Council SitesAwarded / complete21 Jan 2026—
RAWTENSTALL MARKET REFURBISHMENTAwarded / complete9 Jan 2026—
Supply of Natural Gas to Council Buildings - Fixed Price ContractAwarded / complete20 Nov 2025—
IMPROVEMENT WORKS IN THE YOUNGER CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA AT WHITAKER PARKLandscaping work for parksAwarded / complete20 Nov 2025£90,000
Rawtenstall Temporary Market - ConstructionAwarded / complete19 Nov 2025—
Building Decarbonisation Project - Marl Pits Leisure Centre, RawtenstallEnergy-efficiency consultancy servicesAwarded / complete29 Oct 2025£1,679,172
PR003 - RLT Strategic ReviewAwarded / complete28 Oct 2025—
Electricity Supply Contract - Rossendale Borough CouncilElectricityAwarded / complete8 Oct 2025—
Refurbishment of Shop Unit - 8 Trickett's Arcade, WaterfootConstruction workCancelled7 Oct 2025£85,000
Rawtenstall Market OperatorManagement-related servicesOpen4 Sept 2025£20,000
ICT Support ContractComputer support servicesAwarded / complete28 Jul 2025£30,000

Search all 25 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 11 of 13 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.