Sheffield Hallam University: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationYorkshire and the HumberSheffield

Official UK PPONPVMW-4512-JZYY

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months46+21% vs prior 12 months (38)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot420% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 134 awarded procedures · 123 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

134 awarded tenders, 123 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months142 within 6 months · 8 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£43mnet · on 53 of 53 published values · top 5 = 70%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 84 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(82 notices)
    82 of 84 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(2 notices)
    2 of 84 notices are Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted50%(42 notices)
    42 of 84 notices are Limited / restricted (50%).
  • Direct award25%(21 notices)
    21 of 84 notices are Direct award (25%).
  • Open10%(8 notices)
    8 of 84 notices are Open (10%).
  • Route not published10%(8 notices)
    8 of 84 notices are Route not published (10%).
  • Selective6%(5 notices)
    5 of 84 notices are Selective (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=520% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 6 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

93 daysrobust · n=6
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 84 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

011 of 84 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

26.8% above estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
KHIPU NETWORKS LIMITED43%44—
Academia Ltd43%34—
Waters Ltd32.2%13—
Logicalis UK Limited21.5%22—
The Information Lab21.5%22—
Dell Corporation Ltd21.5%22—
BRUKER UK LIMITED21.5%22—
ST-FOUR LIMITED21.5%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 134 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 123 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£43mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 53 of 53 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 70%; a further 9 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£162k middle valuerobust · n=53Middle half £106k–£390k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Media Planning and Buying for Reputation, Business Engagement and Student Recruitment MarketingHavas People Ltd5 Jan 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£10,416,667
≈ £3.5m/yr
Microsoft Software Licensing (EES)Phoenix Software Ltd——£7,910,408 †
2324-80-EST- CATERING CONCESSION CONTRACT OPPORTUNITY FOR HOWARD STREET BUILDINGLOOK ME UP LTD T/A HYGGE CAFES——£5,174,640 †
2324-56-FDR-JZ Security ServicesConstant Security Services——£4,372,892 †
2425-44-DTS-AT Student Records System (SITS)Tribal Education Limited——£2,505,780 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

69 of 145 contracts carry an end date, 41 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 14 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 161 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Browzer Student WelcomeAwarded / complete2 Jul 2026—
Storage Infrustracture ReplacementSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026—
Data Centre Firewall Replacement 2025Software package and information systemsAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026—
Infoblox Hardware, Maintenance and supportDatabase and operating software packageAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
SITS Development ProjectSystems and technical consultancy servicesAwarded / complete29 May 2026—
AI Multi Mini Interview SolutionAwarded / complete20 May 2026—
Mass Notification and Emergency Communications Alert SystemComputer equipment and suppliesAwarded / complete13 May 2026£281,600
Public Relations support for the Property Development ProjectAwarded / complete6 May 2026—
Planning Pre-Application Development for the PropertiesAwarded / complete1 May 2026—
Procuring Alteryx data Analytics PlatformSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete22 Apr 2026—
Travel Management ServiceTravel agency and similar servicesPlanning30 Mar 2026£100,000
Media Planning and Buying for Reputation, Business Engagement and Student Recruitment MarketingAdvertising and marketing servicesAwarded / complete18 Mar 2026£10,416,667
Identity and Access Management SystemIT services: consultingPlanning27 Feb 2026—
2526-01-DTS-SS-YH - Student Health and Social Care Placement SystemSoftware programming and consultancy servicesOpen24 Feb 2026£310,000
Overseas Market Development - South East AsiaAwarded / complete23 Feb 2026—
upply of Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound Scanner SystemAwarded / complete22 Feb 2026—
Supply of High precision non-contact optical metrology systemAwarded / complete20 Feb 2026—
Supply, Installation, and Support of DSC250 Thermal Analysis SystemAwarded / complete20 Feb 2026—
Supply of High precision non-contact optical metrology systemAwarded / complete20 Feb 2026—
Supply and Installation of SKYSCAN 1272 sCMOS UpgradeAwarded / complete20 Feb 2026—

Search all 161 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 69 of 145 published contracts have an end date; 41 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.