Staffordshire County Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: County-or-unitary-authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityWest MidlandsStaffordRan 17 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPZDG-2995-QQMDWebsitestaffordshire.gov.uk ↗

Open now4next deadline 29 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months134+35% vs prior 12 months (99)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot416% single-bid · 25 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 25 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 293 awarded procedures · 641 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

293 awarded tenders, 641 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months17550 within 6 months · 4 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£82mnet · on 154 of 162 published values · 8 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 49%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

4 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 233 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract72%(168 notices)
    168 of 233 notices are Contract (72%).
  • Framework23%(53 notices)
    53 of 233 notices are Framework (23%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system5%(12 notices)
    12 of 233 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (5%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award33%(76 notices)
    76 of 233 notices are Direct award (33%).
  • Open30%(69 notices)
    69 of 233 notices are Open (30%).
  • Selective20%(46 notices)
    46 of 233 notices are Selective (20%).
  • Route not published12%(28 notices)
    28 of 233 notices are Route not published (12%).
  • Limited / restricted6%(14 notices)
    14 of 233 notices are Limited / restricted (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 25 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=2516% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 33 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

50 daysrobust · n=33
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 233 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

059 of 233 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 12 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=12

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Enviro Skip Hire Ltdframework/DPS on 1134.4%131629 Jul 2026
WILLSHEES WASTE & RECYCLING LIMITEDframework/DPS on 2124.1%10171 Sept 2025
Biffa Waste Services Ltdframework/DPS on 593.1%5276 Jan 2026
Dawkes & Co Ltdframework/DPS on 372.4%577 Oct 2025
G Evans (Services) Ltdframework/DPS on 462%4129 Oct 2026
Fords of Blythe Bridge Ltdframework/DPS on 551.7%2109 Oct 2026
J M W SYSTEMS LIMITED41.4%4412 Aug 2026
VEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITEDframework/DPS on 241.4%381 Sept 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 293 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 641 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£82mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 154 of 162 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 49%; a further 6 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£101k middle valuerobust · n=154Middle half £50k–£309k; 8 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Contract for Waste Disposal - Hanford Energy Recovery FacilityStoke-on-Trent City Council——£26,700,000 †
IA3657 Specialist Placements for Pupils with EHCPsThe Haven School Limited25 Jun 20252 yrs · up to 4 yrs£4,622,019
≈ £2.3m/yr
End-to-end Best Interests Assessor Service Court of Protection (CoP) Deprivation of Liberties Service (DoL) and Care Act 2014 Assessment and ReviewsEden Brown Limited6 Oct 20261.9 yrs£3,500,000
≈ £1.8m/yr
Delivery of assessed care packages within Chestnut Grange, MacGregor Tithe and Tyldesley Court.Ave Maria Care Limited8 May 20262 yrs · up to 3 yrs£3,413,119
≈ £1.7m/yr
Domestic Abuse Support in Safe Accommodation (DASSA)Honeycomb Charitable Services Ltd (trading as Glow)—3 yrs · up to 4 yrs£2,178,804
≈ £726k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

492 of 569 contracts carry an end date, 94 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 175 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 371 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
IA3424 2026 RCA Pension Fund Direct PropertiesAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
RTPI Equipment and Associated ServicesAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
Health Visiting Services 0-19 years Cohort StudyResearch consultancy servicesPlanning12 Aug 2026—
Framework Agreement for Demolition and Associated ServicesFrameworkDemolition workAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026£4,000,000
Student Employability and Enterprise ProgrammeTechnical and vocational secondary education servicesAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026£412,000
Supply and Installation of New and Repair of existing Fences and Associated ServicesAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026—

Search all 371 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 492 of 569 published contracts have an end date; 94 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.