Stroud District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth West EnglandStroud

Official UK PPONPRHW-3326-HVMGWebsitestroud.gov.uk ↗

Open now3next deadline 6 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months21+425% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share27%of 22 awarded procedures · 20 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

22 awarded tenders, 20 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months82 within 6 months · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£18mnet · on 14 of 14 published values · top 5 = 96%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

3 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 25 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(25 notices)
    25 of 25 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open80%(20 notices)
    20 of 25 notices are Open (80%).
  • Direct award8%(2 notices)
    2 of 25 notices are Direct award (8%).
  • Selective8%(2 notices)
    2 of 25 notices are Selective (8%).
  • Limited / restricted4%(1 notice)
    1 of 25 notices is Limited / restricted (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

9indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

18 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 25 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

011 of 25 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.3% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Severn Wye Energy Agency Ltd418.2%04—
Smith's (Gloucester) Limited14.5%11—
MD Building Services Ltd14.5%1110 Mar 2026
Joyner P.A. Limited14.5%11—
Hardyman & Co Limited14.5%11—
DLP Planning Limited14.5%11—
PUMP SUPPLIES LIMITED14.5%11—
Safeway Demolition & Plant Hire Ltd14.5%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 27% of 22 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 20 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£18mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 14 of 14 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 96%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£130k middle valuerobust · n=14Middle half £37k–£437k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
H1803 Planned Externals 1IAN WILLIAMS10 Mar 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£7,500,000
≈ £2.5m/yr
H1803 Planned Externals 2MD Building Services Ltd10 Mar 20263 yrs · up to 4 yrs£7,500,000
≈ £2.5m/yr
M5 Crossing Project - GroundworksTIMOTHY CHARLES AND COMPANY LIMITED—1.5 yrs£1,348,734 †
≈ £899k/yr
M5 Crossing Project - Sheet PilingSuttle Projects Ltd (a9 a10)—1.4 yrs£499,521 †
≈ £353k/yr
Minor External WorksJoyner P.A. Limited—3 mo£250,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

21 of 22 contracts carry an end date, 3 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 40 of 40 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
M5 Crossing Project - Construction ManagerConstruction management servicesAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026£200,000
Major Void Refurbishment - 1 Kings Road, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, GL10 2EZ (v2)Construction workAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026£66,000
Active Lifestyles Dursley – Gym RefurbishmentFitness equipmentsAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026£178,000
Major Void Refurbishment - 1A Betworthy, Coaley, Dursley, Gloucesterhire.Refurbishment workAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026£70,000
M5 Crossing Project - DewateringConstruction work for water projectsAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026£75,000
M5 Crossing Project - Sheet PilingConstruction work for water projectsAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026£350,000
Stroud District Council - Planned External Works 2026-2029Construction workAwarded / complete18 Sept 2026£15,000,000
Major Voids Refurbishments - 9 Bunting Way, Forest Green, Nailsworth, GL6 0TQConstruction workOpen8 Sept 2026£90,000
M5 Crossing Project - Temporary DamsConstruction work for water projectsAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026£40,000
Major Voids ITT - 38 Oatfield Road, Frampton on Severn, Gloucestershire, GL2 7HPConstruction workOpen31 Jul 2026£76,000
Major Void Refurbishment - 1 Witcomb Close, Upton St Leonards, Gloucestershire GL4 8AEConstruction workOpen30 Jul 2026£76,000
Supply and Delivery of Beige Polythene Refuse SacksPolythene waste and refuse sacks and bagsAwarded / complete10 Jul 2026£40,000
Flat Roof Replacement - Matthews Way, Stroud, GloucestershireRoof works and other special trade construction worksOpen24 Jun 2026£30,000
M5 Crossing Project - GroundworksWorks for complete or part construction and civil engineering workAwarded / complete22 Jun 2026£1,250,000
Planning Consultancy ServicesAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
Stratford Park Lake road runoff diversion projectConstruction workAwarded / complete3 Mar 2026£30,000
M5 Crossing - LogisticsConstruction workOpen5 Feb 2026£140,000
Minor External WorksAwarded / complete13 Nov 2025—
Demolition of Bonds Mill Bridge, StroudAwarded / complete4 Jul 2025—
Stratford Park Leisure Centre – Lower Car Park – Resurfacing of Car ParkResurfacing worksOpen16 Jun 2025£77,500

Search all 40 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 21 of 22 published contracts have an end date; 3 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.