The Insolvency Service: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive agencyCentral governmentGreater LondonStratford

Official UK PPONPLGZ-7984-QRRR

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months8-43% vs prior 12 months (14)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share43%of 14 awarded procedures · 12 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

14 awarded tenders, 12 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£4.4mnet · on 11 of 11 published values · top 5 = 84%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 22 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(22 notices)
    22 of 22 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Selective36%(8 notices)
    8 of 22 notices are Selective (36%).
  • Direct award32%(7 notices)
    7 of 22 notices are Direct award (32%).
  • Limited / restricted27%(6 notices)
    6 of 22 notices are Limited / restricted (27%).
  • Route not published5%(1 notice)
    1 of 22 notices is Route not published (5%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 22 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 22 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Altia Solutions Limited (UK)214.3%2329 Jun 2026
Ntt Data UK Limited214.3%2228 Mar 2025
Experian Limited214.3%22—
Wordtree Limited17.1%1122 Sept 2026
Aiimi Ltd17.1%11—
Atamis Ltd17.1%11—
People For Research Limited17.1%11—
Ernst and Young LLP17.1%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 43% of 14 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 12 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£4.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 11 of 11 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 84%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£249k middle valuerobust · n=11Middle half £108k–£442k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Data Analytics ToolQUANTEXA LIMITED——£1,950,000 †
DRO (Debt Relief Order) Credit ChecksExperian Limited——£540,000 †
TIS0791 - FCMC Bridging to LiveNtt Data UK Limited—1 yrs£442,000
≈ £442k/yr
TIS0791 - FCMC Bridging to LiveNtt Data UK Limited28 Mar 202511 mo£442,000
AI Automation DiscoveryAiimi Ltd——£296,050 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

6 of 13 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 28 of 28 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Service Mapping (Adjudicator Bankruptcy)Business and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
DRO (Debt Relief Order) Credit ChecksIT services: consultingAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
AI SandboxIT services: consultingAwarded / complete19 Oct 2026—
Data Analytics ToolIT services: consultingAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Comms and Culture ConsultancyAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Altia Toolkit & Toolbar licensesAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
Altia InsightAwarded / complete15 Jul 2026—
Research ParticipantsAwarded / complete17 Apr 2026—
Provision of e-Procurement SystemAwarded / complete7 Jul 2025—
FCMC - Bridging to LiveAwarded / complete3 Jul 2025—
Insurance ServicesInsurance servicesPlanned30 May 2025£2,744,000
DDaT Project ResourcesIT services: consultingPlanned30 May 2025£2,640,000
Legal Panel for Business as Usual RequirementsLegal servicesPlanned30 May 2025£10,000,000
Provision of SIAM, Service Desk and ITSMIT services: consultingPlanned20 May 2025£12,000,000
Civil and Criminal case management systemSoftware package and information systemsPlanned2 May 2025£3,400,000
Document Management and StorageMiscellaneous business and business-related servicesPlanned2 May 2025£3,000,000
Customer Digital Services - RTC/PODIT services: consultingPlanned2 May 2025£1,700,000
Wisdom, Kofax and Service DeliveryIT services: consultingPlanned2 May 2025£2,830,000
FCMC Phase 1 - Bridging to LiveAwarded / complete28 Mar 2025—
Redundancy Payments Service Calculations and Service Development ProjectIT services: consultingPlanned17 Jan 2025£18,700,000

Search all 28 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 6 of 13 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.