The National Archives: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Non-ministerial departmentCentral governmentGreater LondonRichmond

Official UK PPONPTBZ-4379-JQQX

Open now1next deadline 30 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months35-22% vs prior 12 months (45)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot320% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 87 awarded procedures · 76 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

87 awarded tenders, 76 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months179 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£7.7mnet · on 70 of 70 published values · top 5 = 73%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
LEGISLATION PRINT PUBLISHING CONTRACT30 Oct 20264d£3,500,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 80 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(80 notices)
    80 of 80 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award64%(51 notices)
    51 of 80 notices are Direct award (64%).
  • Limited / restricted15%(12 notices)
    12 of 80 notices are Limited / restricted (15%).
  • Open14%(11 notices)
    11 of 80 notices are Open (14%).
  • Route not published6%(5 notices)
    5 of 80 notices are Route not published (6%).
  • Selective1%(1 notices)
    1 of 80 notices are Selective (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=520% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 6 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

74 daysrobust · n=6
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 80 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

07 of 80 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
The Stationery Office33.4%13—
Torchbox Ltd22.3%22—
Progress Software Corporation22.3%22—
Venturebright Ltd22.3%227 Aug 2026
NLA Media Access Limited22.3%22—
Relx (UK) Limited t/a LexisNexis22.3%22—
Lamb Personnel Limited22.3%22—
Pi Consult Limited22.3%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 87 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 76 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£7.7mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 70 of 70 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 73%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£22k middle valuerobust · n=70Middle half £16k–£44k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Find Case Law Public Beta DevelopmentThe Dextrous Web Ltd13 Mar 20262 yrs · up to 3 yrs£2,875,000
≈ £1.4m/yr
Legal Document Toolkit DevelopmentVenturebright Ltd7 Aug 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£1,666,667
≈ £556k/yr
Building Services Call Off ContractDSSR Ltd11 Jul 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£500,000
≈ £167k/yr
RICHES WorksKomfort Services ltd—2 mo£377,981 †
SUPPLY OF MACRO X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (MA-XRF) SYSTEMBlueScientific Ltd4 Nov 20254 mo£168,678

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

84 of 85 contracts carry an end date, 14 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 17 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 105 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Showcase Alarms and MonitorsAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
Legal Document Toolkit DevelopmentResearch and development consultancy servicesAwarded / complete3 Sept 2026£1,666,666
Specops LicencesAwarded / complete19 Aug 2026—
LEGISLATION PLATFORM CONTRACTInformation technology servicesOpen14 Aug 2026£8,500,000
Contingent LabourAwarded / complete17 Jul 2026—
Ticketing & Online Shop platform consultancyAwarded / complete17 Jul 2026—
Gym Service ProvisionAwarded / complete17 Jul 2026—
Sustainability Data Management & ReportingAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
One Identity LicencesAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
NLA Media Access License 2026-2027Awarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
Minor Works for the Revolution 250 ExhibitionAwarded / complete27 May 2026—
Evaluation of the Archives Revealed Funding Programme 2026 - 2029Evaluation consultancy servicesAwarded / complete27 May 2026£120,883
Media Monitoring ProviderAwarded / complete26 May 2026—
Optimus Support & MaintenanceAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
Silver Incident Response RetainerAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
Lucid Suite SoftwareAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
Lexis Nexis + SubscriptionAwarded / complete27 Apr 2026—
Find Case Law Public Beta DevelopmentInformation technology servicesAwarded / complete22 Apr 2026£2,875,000
HR Professional ServicesAwarded / complete27 Mar 2026—
Supply of Frames & Display CasesAwarded / complete27 Mar 2026—

Search all 105 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 84 of 85 published contracts have an end date; 14 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.