UK Hydrographic Office: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive agencyCentral governmentSouth East EnglandTaunton

Official UK PPONPZZG-9616-WGXT

Open now1next deadline 28 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months32+10% vs prior 12 months (29)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 79 awarded procedures · 81 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

79 awarded tenders, 81 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months234 within 6 months · 15 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£38mnet · on 31 of 31 published values · top 5 = 94%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Connected Business Platforms Systems Integrator Service Provision28 Oct 202634h£5,000,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 61 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract89%(54 notices)
    54 of 61 notices are Contract (89%).
  • Framework10%(6 notices)
    6 of 61 notices are Framework (10%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system2%(1 notice)
    1 of 61 notices is Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open36%(22 notices)
    22 of 61 notices are Open (36%).
  • Direct award34%(21 notices)
    21 of 61 notices are Direct award (34%).
  • Selective11%(7 notices)
    7 of 61 notices are Selective (11%).
  • Route not published10%(6 notices)
    6 of 61 notices are Route not published (10%).
  • Limited / restricted8%(5 notices)
    5 of 61 notices are Limited / restricted (8%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2indicative · n=250% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

77 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 61 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

012 of 61 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

4.4% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Hobbs the Printers Limitedframework/DPS on 133.8%135 Feb 2026
Amey Community Ltd33.8%03—
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP33.8%03—
Compass Contract Services (UK) Ltd22.5%2421 Sept 2026
VAISALA LTD22.5%22—
IIC Technologies Ltdframework/DPS on 222.5%1625 Mar 2026
Dun and Bradstreet Limited22.5%12—
Mastek (UK) Ltd22.5%1223 Mar 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 79 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 81 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£38mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 31 of 31 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 94%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£54k middle valuerobust · n=31Middle half £21k–£150k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Development and Support ServicesScrumconnect Ltd15 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 6.1 yrs£11,500,000
≈ £3.8m/yr
Licencing Agreement & Publication CapabilityTeledyne Geospatial, a business unit of Teledyne Digital Imaging, Inc.—5 yrs£11,295,000
≈ £2.3m/yr
Publications Support and Development 2026CHERSOFT LIMITED28 Apr 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£10,500,000
≈ £3.5m/yr
Application Support - 1 Year Transition OnlyMastek (UK) Ltd—3 mo£1,600,000
User Experience Capability 2026Bramble Hub Limited11 Sept 20262 yrs · up to 3 yrs£1,000,000
≈ £500k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

51 of 98 contracts carry an end date, 23 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 23 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 123 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Publications Support and Development 2026IT services: consultingAwarded / complete28 Apr 2026£11,500,000
Geocable DatabaseAwarded / complete30 Mar 2026—
UKHO ExpressRouteIT services: consultingAwarded / complete30 Mar 2026—
Application Support 2027IT services: consultingPlanned23 Mar 2026£10,000,000
Application Support - 1 Year Transition OnlyAwarded / complete23 Mar 2026—
UKHO Maritime/Geospatial Software Development and Support Services - DPS 2.0DPSIT services: consultingOpen23 Feb 2026£4,000,000
UKHO Book Publications 2026FrameworkPrinting and related servicesAwarded / complete5 Feb 2026£4,600,000
Integrated Continuous Plankton RecorderAwarded / complete23 Jan 2026—
Supply, Delivery, Installation & On-Site Maintenance of Digitisation Scanning EquipmentScannersOpen9 Dec 2025£80,000
Facilities Management Support 25-27FrameworkFacilities management servicesAwarded / complete9 Dec 2025—
Quantifying UKHO’s Value to UK PLCBusiness analysis consultancy servicesOpen28 Nov 2025£75,000
Quantifying UKHO’s Value to UK PLCBusiness analysis consultancy servicesPlanned26 Nov 2025£75,000
Publications Storage and Fulfilment ServicesStorage and warehousing servicesPlanned12 Nov 2025£4,000,000
Maldives Seabed Mapping - Cost / Benefit AnalysisEconomic research servicesAwarded / complete30 Oct 2025£39,167
UKHO - Hubspot Firmographic DataAwarded / complete30 Oct 2025—
Membership to Chartered Institute of Customer Services 2025-2028Awarded / complete27 Oct 2025—
Scientific Journal Subscriptions 2025-2026Awarded / complete20 Oct 2025—
Financial Auditing for the UKHO- IC-ENC 2026Financial auditing servicesPlanned15 Oct 2025£108,000
UKHO - Review of data supplier researchAwarded / complete9 Oct 2025—
Data AcquisitionAwarded / complete9 Oct 2025—

Search all 123 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 51 of 98 published contracts have an end date; 23 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.