UK Fusion Energy Ltd: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGOV.UK register: Sub organisationCentral governmentSouth East EnglandAbingdon

Official UK PPONPCRM-7973-DCBL

Open now1next deadline 29 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months95+83% vs prior 12 months (52)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot39.5% single-bid · 21 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 21 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share17%of 72 awarded procedures · 71 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

72 awarded tenders, 71 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1810 within 6 months · 6 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£148mnet · on 60 of 60 published values · top 5 = 82%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
PLANC (Permitting, Licences, Authorisations, Notifications & Consent) Assurance29 Oct 20269h£1,200,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 147 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract95%(140 notices)
    140 of 147 notices are Contract (95%).
  • Framework3%(4 notices)
    4 of 147 notices are Framework (3%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system2%(3 notices)
    3 of 147 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published36%(53 notices)
    53 of 147 notices are Route not published (36%).
  • Open33%(49 notices)
    49 of 147 notices are Open (33%).
  • Direct award19%(28 notices)
    28 of 147 notices are Direct award (19%).
  • Limited / restricted7%(10 notices)
    10 of 147 notices are Limited / restricted (7%).
  • Selective5%(7 notices)
    7 of 147 notices are Selective (5%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 21 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=219.5% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 27 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

28 daysrobust · n=27
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 148 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

036 of 148 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 18 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=18

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Amentum Clean Energy Ltdframework/DPS on 256.9%51013 Oct 2026
Kyoto Fusioneeringframework/DPS on 156.9%5513 Oct 2026
UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTERframework/DPS on 145.6%4513 Oct 2026
Oxford Sigmaframework/DPS on 234.2%3413 Oct 2026
NPL Management Limitedframework/DPS on 134.2%344 Aug 2026
TSM Engineering34.2%336 Aug 2025
University of Strathclydeframework/DPS on 122.8%243 Aug 2026
Fujikura Europe Ltd.framework/DPS on 222.8%237 Nov 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 17% of 72 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 71 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£148mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 60 of 60 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 82%; a further 6 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£200k middle valuerobust · n=60Middle half £97k–£500k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Magnets Partner AgreementTokamak Energy Ltd25 Mar 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£70,000,000
≈ £23m/yr
PLM Support ServicesDassault Systemes UK Limited——£18,320,000 †
3DX Platform Licences and Wider EcosystemDassault Systemes UK Limited——£16,926,920 †
Call-Off Contract No. PP-UKIFS-218d for the supply of HighPerformance Computing - Updateboxxe Limited——£8,901,555 †
2G (REBCO-based) HTS Tape for the STEP Toroidal Field Model CoilShanghai Superconductor Technology Co.,14 Oct 20251.7 yrs · up to 3.2 yrs£7,000,000
≈ £4.2m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

40 of 48 contracts carry an end date, 6 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 18 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 147 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Cryogenic Plant - Design Study - Multi YearEngineering design servicesAwarded / complete17 Jun 2026£1,000,000
DCO Interface, Co-ordination and Consultation ServicesAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
Power Cycle and Cooling DevelopmentElectricity distributionOpen8 Jun 2026£9,500,000
Systems Engineering and Whole Plant Integration Partner (SEWPIP)Advisory and consultative engineering servicesPlanning5 Jun 2026£0
Third Party Verification and Validation of the STEP Whole Programme Cost EstimateCalculation of costsAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026£250,000
Fusion Plant Controls Partner (FPCP)Engineering servicesPlanning3 Jun 2026£0
Data Management ServicesData servicesAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026£400,000
Crane Concept Design StudyBridge cranesPlanning2 Jun 2026£70,000
UKFE Embedded Engineering Resources Framework (UKFE EERF)FrameworkEngineering design servicesPlanning28 May 2026£0

Search all 147 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 40 of 48 published contracts have an end date; 6 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.